Size comparison · drawn to scale
Toyota Urban Cruiser electric vs Mazda CX-3 DK: size comparison
- Length Urban Cruiser electric 10 mm0.4 in longer
- Width Urban Cruiser electric 35 mm1 in wider
- Height Urban Cruiser electric 100 mm4 in taller
- Boot CX-3 DK 40 L1.4 cu ft more
Car 1 blue, solid outline
Car 2 coral, dashed outline
Change cars
Zoom in to read the measurements - or see the table below.
Scale about 1:21 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles Front view: width without mirrors Top view: footprint on the road
Dimensions and difference
The Urban Cruiser electric is 10 mm0.4 in longer, 35 mm1 in wider and 100 mm4 in taller than the CX-3 DK. Its wheelbase is 130 mm5 in longer.
| Dimension | Urban Cruiser electric | CX-3 DK | Difference, car 1 vs car 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,285 mm14 ft 1 in14 ft 1 in4,285 mm | 4,275 mm14 ft 0 in14 ft 0 in4,275 mm | +10 mm+0.4 in +0.2% |
| Width | 1,800 mm5 ft 11 in5 ft 11 in1,800 mm | 1,765 mm5 ft 9 in5 ft 9 in1,765 mm | +35 mm+1 in +2.0% |
| Height | 1,635 mm5 ft 4 in5 ft 4 in1,635 mm | 1,535 mm5 ft 0 in5 ft 0 in1,535 mm | +100 mm+4 in +6.5% |
| Wheelbase | 2,700 mm8 ft 10 in8 ft 10 in2,700 mm | 2,570 mm8 ft 5 in8 ft 5 in2,570 mm | +130 mm+5 in +5.1% |
| Footprint | 7.71 m²83.0 sq ft83.0 sq ft7.71 m² | 7.55 m²81.2 sq ft81.2 sq ft7.55 m² | +0.17 m²+1.8 sq ft +2.2% |
| Boot | 310 L10.9 cu ft10.9 cu ft310 L | 350 L12.4 cu ft12.4 cu ft350 L | −40 L−1.4 cu ft −11.4% |
| Kerb weight | 1,839 kg4,054 lb4,054 lb1,839 kg | 1,254–1,331 kg2,765–2,934 lb2,765–2,934 lb1,254–1,331 kg | +585 kg+1,290 lb +46.7% |
Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not. Weight difference compares the lightest versions.
Garage and parking
A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.
Urban Cruiser electric
- Single garage
- Fits 1,215 mm4 ft 0 in to spare in length, 600 mm2 ft 0 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 715 mm2 ft 4 in to spare in length, 350 mm1 ft 2 in each side
CX-3 DK
- Single garage
- Fits 1,225 mm4 ft 0 in to spare in length, 618 mm2 ft 0 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 725 mm2 ft 5 in to spare in length, 368 mm1 ft 2 in each side
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, the Toyota Urban Cruiser electric or the Mazda CX-3 DK?
The Toyota Urban Cruiser electric is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The Urban Cruiser electric is 10 mm longer, 35 mm wider and 100 mm taller than the CX-3 DK. Its wheelbase is 130 mm longer.
Will the Toyota Urban Cruiser electric and the Mazda CX-3 DK fit in a standard garage?
In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Toyota Urban Cruiser electric fits with room to open the doors (1,215 mm to spare in length, 600 mm each side). The Mazda CX-3 DK fits with room to open the doors (1,225 mm to spare in length, 618 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Mazda CX-3 DK: 350 L against 310 L in the Toyota Urban Cruiser electric (seats up, as quoted by the maker).
Drawn to one scale
Both cars use the same millimetre grid, so a longer bonnet or a taller roof shows exactly as it is.
Wheels at the real wheelbase
Dashed lines mark the axles. In Overlay both cars start at the front bumper; car 2 has a dashed outline.
Will it fit my garage?
Switch to Top view, or to feet and inches if your garage plan is in feet. Allow about 600 mm (2 ft) for opening the doors.