Garage
ENES
Car finder

Size comparison · drawn to scale

Nissan X-Trail T33 vs Volvo XC60 II: size comparison

  • Length About the same length
  • Width XC60 II 62 mm2 in wider
  • Height X-Trail T33 62 mm2 in taller
  • Boot X-Trail T33 77 L2.7 cu ft more

Car 1 blue, solid outline

X-Trail T33 Nissan · 2020–present · SUV X-Trail T33 4,680 × 1,840 × 1,720 mm15 ft 4 in × 6 ft 0 in × 5 ft 8 in Change

Car 2 coral, dashed outline

XC60 II Volvo · 2017–present · SUV XC60 II 4,688 × 1,902 × 1,658 mm15 ft 5 in × 6 ft 3 in × 5 ft 5 in Change
Change cars

Search any brand, model or year. Models we have no dimensions for yet are shown in grey.

  • Car 1, blue, solid outline: X-Trail T33
  • Car 2, coral, dashed outline: XC60 II
0 m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m1 m0 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ft6 ft7 ft8 ft9 ft10 ft11 ft12 ft13 ft14 ft15 ft16 ft17 ft18 ft19 ft20 ft21 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ftWheelbase 2,705 mmWheelbase 8 ft 10 inLength 4,680 mmLength 15 ft 4 in1,720 mm5 ft 8 inWheelbase 2,865 mmWheelbase 9 ft 5 inLength 4,688 mmLength 15 ft 5 in1,658 mm5 ft 5 in

Scale about 1:22 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles

Dimensions and difference

The X-Trail T33 is 8 mm0.3 in shorter, 62 mm2 in narrower and 62 mm2 in taller than the XC60 II. Its wheelbase is 160 mm6 in shorter.

DimensionX-Trail T33XC60 IIDifference, car 1 vs car 2
Length4,680 mm15 ft 4 in15 ft 4 in4,680 mm4,688 mm15 ft 5 in15 ft 5 in4,688 mm −8 mm−0.3 in −0.2%
Width1,840 mm6 ft 0 in6 ft 0 in1,840 mm1,902 mm6 ft 3 in6 ft 3 in1,902 mm −62 mm−2 in −3.3%
Height1,720 mm5 ft 8 in5 ft 8 in1,720 mm1,658 mm5 ft 5 in5 ft 5 in1,658 mm +62 mm+2 in +3.7%
Wheelbase2,705 mm8 ft 10 in8 ft 10 in2,705 mm2,865 mm9 ft 5 in9 ft 5 in2,865 mm −160 mm−6 in −5.6%
Footprint8.61 m²92.7 sq ft92.7 sq ft8.61 m²8.92 m²96.0 sq ft96.0 sq ft8.92 m² −0.31 m²−3.3 sq ft −3.4%
Boot560 L19.8 cu ft19.8 cu ft560 L483 L17.1 cu ft17.1 cu ft483 L +77 L+2.7 cu ft +15.9%
Kerb weight1,664–1,924 kg3,668–4,242 lb3,668–4,242 lb1,664–1,924 kg1,764–2,162 kg3,889–4,766 lb3,889–4,766 lb1,764–2,162 kg −100 kg−220 lb −5.7%

Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type — proportions are exact, styling is not. Weight difference compares the lightest versions.

Garage and parking

A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.

X-Trail T33

Single garage
Tight 820 mm2 ft 8 in to spare in length, 580 mm1 ft 11 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 320 mm1 ft 1 in to spare in length, 330 mm1 ft 1 in each side

XC60 II

Single garage
Tight 812 mm2 ft 8 in to spare in length, 549 mm1 ft 10 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 312 mm1 ft 0 in to spare in length, 299 mm1 ft 0 in each side

Check your own garage with these cars

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, the Nissan X-Trail T33 or the Volvo XC60 II?

The Volvo XC60 II is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The X-Trail T33 is 8 mm shorter, 62 mm narrower and 62 mm taller than the XC60 II. Its wheelbase is 160 mm shorter.

Will the Nissan X-Trail T33 and the Volvo XC60 II fit in a standard garage?

In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Nissan X-Trail T33 fits, but it is tight to get out (820 mm to spare in length, 580 mm each side). The Volvo XC60 II fits, but it is tight to get out (812 mm to spare in length, 549 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Nissan X-Trail T33: 560 L against 483 L in the Volvo XC60 II (seats up, as quoted by the maker).

Compare other cars

Report an error