Garage
ENES
Car finder

Size comparison · drawn to scale

Volvo XC60 II vs Nissan X-Trail T33: size comparison

  • Length About the same length
  • Width XC60 II 62 mm2 in wider
  • Height X-Trail T33 62 mm2 in taller
  • Boot X-Trail T33 77 L2.7 cu ft more

Car 1 blue, solid outline

XC60 II Volvo · 2017–present · SUV XC60 II 4,688 × 1,902 × 1,658 mm15 ft 5 in × 6 ft 3 in × 5 ft 5 in Change

Car 2 coral, dashed outline

X-Trail T33 Nissan · 2020–present · SUV X-Trail T33 4,680 × 1,840 × 1,720 mm15 ft 4 in × 6 ft 0 in × 5 ft 8 in Change
Change cars

Search any brand, model or year. Models we have no dimensions for yet are shown in grey.

  • Car 1, blue, solid outline: XC60 II
  • Car 2, coral, dashed outline: X-Trail T33
0 m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m1 m0 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ft6 ft7 ft8 ft9 ft10 ft11 ft12 ft13 ft14 ft15 ft16 ft17 ft18 ft19 ft20 ft21 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ftWheelbase 2,865 mmWheelbase 9 ft 5 inLength 4,688 mmLength 15 ft 5 in1,658 mm5 ft 5 inWheelbase 2,705 mmWheelbase 8 ft 10 inLength 4,680 mmLength 15 ft 4 in1,720 mm5 ft 8 in

Scale about 1:22 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles

Dimensions and difference

The XC60 II is 8 mm0.3 in longer, 62 mm2 in wider and 62 mm2 in lower than the X-Trail T33. Its wheelbase is 160 mm6 in longer.

DimensionXC60 IIX-Trail T33Difference, car 1 vs car 2
Length4,688 mm15 ft 5 in15 ft 5 in4,688 mm4,680 mm15 ft 4 in15 ft 4 in4,680 mm +8 mm+0.3 in +0.2%
Width1,902 mm6 ft 3 in6 ft 3 in1,902 mm1,840 mm6 ft 0 in6 ft 0 in1,840 mm +62 mm+2 in +3.4%
Height1,658 mm5 ft 5 in5 ft 5 in1,658 mm1,720 mm5 ft 8 in5 ft 8 in1,720 mm −62 mm−2 in −3.6%
Wheelbase2,865 mm9 ft 5 in9 ft 5 in2,865 mm2,705 mm8 ft 10 in8 ft 10 in2,705 mm +160 mm+6 in +5.9%
Footprint8.92 m²96.0 sq ft96.0 sq ft8.92 m²8.61 m²92.7 sq ft92.7 sq ft8.61 m² +0.31 m²+3.3 sq ft +3.5%
Boot483 L17.1 cu ft17.1 cu ft483 L560 L19.8 cu ft19.8 cu ft560 L −77 L−2.7 cu ft −13.8%
Kerb weight1,764–2,162 kg3,889–4,766 lb3,889–4,766 lb1,764–2,162 kg1,664–1,924 kg3,668–4,242 lb3,668–4,242 lb1,664–1,924 kg +100 kg+220 lb +6.0%

Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not. Weight difference compares the lightest versions.

Garage and parking

A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.

XC60 II

Single garage
Tight 812 mm2 ft 8 in to spare in length, 549 mm1 ft 10 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 312 mm1 ft 0 in to spare in length, 299 mm1 ft 0 in each side

X-Trail T33

Single garage
Tight 820 mm2 ft 8 in to spare in length, 580 mm1 ft 11 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 320 mm1 ft 1 in to spare in length, 330 mm1 ft 1 in each side

Check your own garage with these cars

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, the Volvo XC60 II or the Nissan X-Trail T33?

The Volvo XC60 II is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The XC60 II is 8 mm longer, 62 mm wider and 62 mm lower than the X-Trail T33. Its wheelbase is 160 mm longer.

Will the Volvo XC60 II and the Nissan X-Trail T33 fit in a standard garage?

In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Volvo XC60 II fits, but it is tight to get out (812 mm to spare in length, 549 mm each side). The Nissan X-Trail T33 fits, but it is tight to get out (820 mm to spare in length, 580 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Nissan X-Trail T33: 560 L against 483 L in the Volvo XC60 II (seats up, as quoted by the maker).

Compare other cars

Report an error