Garage
ENES
Car finder

Size comparison · drawn to scale

Porsche Macan I vs Volvo XC60 II: size comparison

  • Length About the same length
  • Width Macan I 21 mm0.8 in wider
  • Height XC60 II 34 mm1 in taller
  • Boot Macan I 17 L0.6 cu ft more

Car 1 blue, solid outline

Macan I Porsche · 2013–present · SUV Macan I 4,681 × 1,923 × 1,624 mm15 ft 4 in × 6 ft 4 in × 5 ft 4 in Change

Car 2 coral, dashed outline

XC60 II Volvo · 2017–present · SUV XC60 II 4,688 × 1,902 × 1,658 mm15 ft 5 in × 6 ft 3 in × 5 ft 5 in Change
Change cars

Search any brand, model or year. Models we have no dimensions for yet are shown in grey.

  • Car 1, blue, solid outline: Macan I
  • Car 2, coral, dashed outline: XC60 II
0 m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m1 m0 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ft6 ft7 ft8 ft9 ft10 ft11 ft12 ft13 ft14 ft15 ft16 ft17 ft18 ft19 ft20 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ftWheelbase 2,807 mmWheelbase 9 ft 3 inLength 4,681 mmLength 15 ft 4 in1,624 mm5 ft 4 inWheelbase 2,865 mmWheelbase 9 ft 5 inLength 4,688 mmLength 15 ft 5 in1,658 mm5 ft 5 in

Scale about 1:22 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles

Dimensions and difference

The Macan I is 7 mm0.3 in shorter, 21 mm0.8 in wider and 34 mm1 in lower than the XC60 II. Its wheelbase is 58 mm2 in shorter.

DimensionMacan IXC60 IIDifference, car 1 vs car 2
Length4,681 mm15 ft 4 in15 ft 4 in4,681 mm4,688 mm15 ft 5 in15 ft 5 in4,688 mm −7 mm−0.3 in −0.1%
Width1,923 mm6 ft 4 in6 ft 4 in1,923 mm1,902 mm6 ft 3 in6 ft 3 in1,902 mm +21 mm+0.8 in +1.1%
Height1,624 mm5 ft 4 in5 ft 4 in1,624 mm1,658 mm5 ft 5 in5 ft 5 in1,658 mm −34 mm−1 in −2.1%
Wheelbase2,807 mm9 ft 3 in9 ft 3 in2,807 mm2,865 mm9 ft 5 in9 ft 5 in2,865 mm −58 mm−2 in −2.0%
Footprint9.00 m²96.9 sq ft96.9 sq ft9.00 m²8.92 m²96.0 sq ft96.0 sq ft8.92 m² +0.08 m²+0.9 sq ft +1.0%
Boot500 L17.7 cu ft17.7 cu ft500 L483 L17.1 cu ft17.1 cu ft483 L +17 L+0.6 cu ft +3.5%
Kerb weight1,845–1,940 kg4,068–4,277 lb4,068–4,277 lb1,845–1,940 kg1,764–2,162 kg3,889–4,766 lb3,889–4,766 lb1,764–2,162 kg +81 kg+179 lb +4.6%

Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not. Weight difference compares the lightest versions.

Garage and parking

A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.

Macan I

Single garage
Tight 819 mm2 ft 8 in to spare in length, 539 mm1 ft 9 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 319 mm1 ft 1 in to spare in length, 289 mm11 in each side

XC60 II

Single garage
Tight 812 mm2 ft 8 in to spare in length, 549 mm1 ft 10 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 312 mm1 ft 0 in to spare in length, 299 mm1 ft 0 in each side

Check your own garage with these cars

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, the Porsche Macan I or the Volvo XC60 II?

They are practically the same size. The Macan I is 7 mm shorter, 21 mm wider and 34 mm lower than the XC60 II. Its wheelbase is 58 mm shorter.

Will the Porsche Macan I and the Volvo XC60 II fit in a standard garage?

In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Porsche Macan I fits, but it is tight to get out (819 mm to spare in length, 539 mm each side). The Volvo XC60 II fits, but it is tight to get out (812 mm to spare in length, 549 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Porsche Macan I: 500 L against 483 L in the Volvo XC60 II (seats up, as quoted by the maker).

Compare other cars

Report an error