Garage
ENES
Car finder

Size comparison · drawn to scale

Nissan X-Trail T32 vs Skoda Enyaq I: size comparison

  • Length About the same length
  • Width Enyaq I 57 mm2 in wider
  • Height X-Trail T32 92 mm4 in taller
  • Boot Enyaq I 35 L1.2 cu ft more

Car 1 blue, solid outline

X-Trail T32 Nissan · 2013–2022 · SUV X-Trail T32 4,640 × 1,820 × 1,710 mm15 ft 3 in × 6 ft 0 in × 5 ft 7 in Change

Car 2 coral, dashed outline

Enyaq I Skoda · 2020–present · SUV Enyaq I 4,648 × 1,877 × 1,618 mm15 ft 3 in × 6 ft 2 in × 5 ft 4 in Change
Change cars

Search any brand, model or year. Models we have no dimensions for yet are shown in grey.

  • Car 1, blue, solid outline: X-Trail T32
  • Car 2, coral, dashed outline: Enyaq I
0 m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m1 m0 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ft6 ft7 ft8 ft9 ft10 ft11 ft12 ft13 ft14 ft15 ft16 ft17 ft18 ft19 ft20 ft21 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ftWheelbase 2,705 mmWheelbase 8 ft 10 inLength 4,640 mmLength 15 ft 3 in1,710 mm5 ft 7 inWheelbase 2,765 mmWheelbase 9 ft 1 inLength 4,648 mmLength 15 ft 3 in1,618 mm5 ft 4 in

Scale about 1:22 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles

Dimensions and difference

The X-Trail T32 is 8 mm0.3 in shorter, 57 mm2 in narrower and 92 mm4 in taller than the Enyaq I. Its wheelbase is 60 mm2 in shorter.

DimensionX-Trail T32Enyaq IDifference, car 1 vs car 2
Length4,640 mm15 ft 3 in15 ft 3 in4,640 mm4,648 mm15 ft 3 in15 ft 3 in4,648 mm −8 mm−0.3 in −0.2%
Width1,820 mm6 ft 0 in6 ft 0 in1,820 mm1,877 mm6 ft 2 in6 ft 2 in1,877 mm −57 mm−2 in −3.0%
Height1,710 mm5 ft 7 in5 ft 7 in1,710 mm1,618 mm5 ft 4 in5 ft 4 in1,618 mm +92 mm+4 in +5.7%
Wheelbase2,705 mm8 ft 10 in8 ft 10 in2,705 mm2,765 mm9 ft 1 in9 ft 1 in2,765 mm −60 mm−2 in −2.2%
Footprint8.44 m²90.9 sq ft90.9 sq ft8.44 m²8.72 m²93.9 sq ft93.9 sq ft8.72 m² −0.28 m²−3.0 sq ft −3.2%
Boot550 L19.4 cu ft19.4 cu ft550 L585 L20.7 cu ft20.7 cu ft585 L −35 L−1.2 cu ft −6.0%
Kerb weight1,505–1,775 kg3,318–3,913 lb3,318–3,913 lb1,505–1,775 kg1,941–2,265 kg4,279–4,993 lb4,279–4,993 lb1,941–2,265 kg −436 kg−961 lb −22.5%

Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not. Weight difference compares the lightest versions.

Garage and parking

A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.

X-Trail T32

Single garage
Tight 860 mm2 ft 10 in to spare in length, 590 mm1 ft 11 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 360 mm1 ft 2 in to spare in length, 340 mm1 ft 1 in each side

Enyaq I

Single garage
Tight 852 mm2 ft 10 in to spare in length, 562 mm1 ft 10 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 352 mm1 ft 2 in to spare in length, 312 mm1 ft 0 in each side

Check your own garage with these cars

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, the Nissan X-Trail T32 or the Skoda Enyaq I?

The Skoda Enyaq I is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The X-Trail T32 is 8 mm shorter, 57 mm narrower and 92 mm taller than the Enyaq I. Its wheelbase is 60 mm shorter.

Will the Nissan X-Trail T32 and the Skoda Enyaq I fit in a standard garage?

In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Nissan X-Trail T32 fits, but it is tight to get out (860 mm to spare in length, 590 mm each side). The Skoda Enyaq I fits, but it is tight to get out (852 mm to spare in length, 562 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Skoda Enyaq I: 585 L against 550 L in the Nissan X-Trail T32 (seats up, as quoted by the maker).

Compare other cars

Report an error