Garage
ENES
Car finder

Size comparison · drawn to scale

Skoda Enyaq I vs Mitsubishi Outlander GF: size comparison

  • Length About the same length
  • Width Enyaq I 77 mm3 in wider
  • Height Outlander GF 62 mm2 in taller
  • Boot Outlander GF 6 L0.2 cu ft more

Car 1 blue, solid outline

Enyaq I Skoda · 2020–present · SUV Enyaq I 4,648 × 1,877 × 1,618 mm15 ft 3 in × 6 ft 2 in × 5 ft 4 in Change

Car 2 coral, dashed outline

Outlander GF Mitsubishi · 2012–2021 · SUV Outlander GF 4,655 × 1,800 × 1,680 mm15 ft 3 in × 5 ft 11 in × 5 ft 6 in Change
Change cars

Search any brand, model or year. Models we have no dimensions for yet are shown in grey.

  • Car 1, blue, solid outline: Enyaq I
  • Car 2, coral, dashed outline: Outlander GF
0 m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m1 m0 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ft6 ft7 ft8 ft9 ft10 ft11 ft12 ft13 ft14 ft15 ft16 ft17 ft18 ft19 ft20 ft21 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ftWheelbase 2,765 mmWheelbase 9 ft 1 inLength 4,648 mmLength 15 ft 3 in1,618 mm5 ft 4 inWheelbase 2,670 mmWheelbase 8 ft 9 inLength 4,655 mmLength 15 ft 3 in1,680 mm5 ft 6 in

Scale about 1:22 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles

Dimensions and difference

The Enyaq I is 7 mm0.3 in shorter, 77 mm3 in wider and 62 mm2 in lower than the Outlander GF. Its wheelbase is 95 mm4 in longer.

DimensionEnyaq IOutlander GFDifference, car 1 vs car 2
Length4,648 mm15 ft 3 in15 ft 3 in4,648 mm4,655 mm15 ft 3 in15 ft 3 in4,655 mm −7 mm−0.3 in −0.2%
Width1,877 mm6 ft 2 in6 ft 2 in1,877 mm1,800 mm5 ft 11 in5 ft 11 in1,800 mm +77 mm+3 in +4.3%
Height1,618 mm5 ft 4 in5 ft 4 in1,618 mm1,680 mm5 ft 6 in5 ft 6 in1,680 mm −62 mm−2 in −3.7%
Wheelbase2,765 mm9 ft 1 in9 ft 1 in2,765 mm2,670 mm8 ft 9 in8 ft 9 in2,670 mm +95 mm+4 in +3.6%
Footprint8.72 m²93.9 sq ft93.9 sq ft8.72 m²8.38 m²90.2 sq ft90.2 sq ft8.38 m² +0.35 m²+3.7 sq ft +4.1%
Boot585 L20.7 cu ft20.7 cu ft585 L591 L20.9 cu ft20.9 cu ft591 L −6 L−0.2 cu ft −1.0%
Kerb weight1,941–2,265 kg4,279–4,993 lb4,279–4,993 lb1,941–2,265 kg1,495 kg3,296 lb3,296 lb1,495 kg +446 kg+983 lb +29.8%

Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not. Weight difference compares the lightest versions.

Garage and parking

A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.

Enyaq I

Single garage
Tight 852 mm2 ft 10 in to spare in length, 562 mm1 ft 10 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 352 mm1 ft 2 in to spare in length, 312 mm1 ft 0 in each side

Outlander GF

Single garage
Fits 845 mm2 ft 9 in to spare in length, 600 mm2 ft 0 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 345 mm1 ft 2 in to spare in length, 350 mm1 ft 2 in each side

Check your own garage with these cars

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, the Skoda Enyaq I or the Mitsubishi Outlander GF?

The Skoda Enyaq I is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The Enyaq I is 7 mm shorter, 77 mm wider and 62 mm lower than the Outlander GF. Its wheelbase is 95 mm longer.

Will the Skoda Enyaq I and the Mitsubishi Outlander GF fit in a standard garage?

In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Skoda Enyaq I fits, but it is tight to get out (852 mm to spare in length, 562 mm each side). The Mitsubishi Outlander GF fits with room to open the doors (845 mm to spare in length, 600 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Mitsubishi Outlander GF: 591 L against 585 L in the Skoda Enyaq I (seats up, as quoted by the maker).

Compare other cars

Report an error