Garage
ENES
Car finder

Size comparison · drawn to scale

Mitsubishi Outlander GF vs Skoda Enyaq I: size comparison

  • Length About the same length
  • Width Enyaq I 77 mm3 in wider
  • Height Outlander GF 62 mm2 in taller
  • Boot Outlander GF 6 L0.2 cu ft more

Car 1 blue, solid outline

Outlander GF Mitsubishi · 2012–2021 · SUV Outlander GF 4,655 × 1,800 × 1,680 mm15 ft 3 in × 5 ft 11 in × 5 ft 6 in Change

Car 2 coral, dashed outline

Enyaq I Skoda · 2020–present · SUV Enyaq I 4,648 × 1,877 × 1,618 mm15 ft 3 in × 6 ft 2 in × 5 ft 4 in Change
Change cars

Search any brand, model or year. Models we have no dimensions for yet are shown in grey.

  • Car 1, blue, solid outline: Outlander GF
  • Car 2, coral, dashed outline: Enyaq I
0 m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m1 m0 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ft6 ft7 ft8 ft9 ft10 ft11 ft12 ft13 ft14 ft15 ft16 ft17 ft18 ft19 ft20 ft21 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ftWheelbase 2,670 mmWheelbase 8 ft 9 inLength 4,655 mmLength 15 ft 3 in1,680 mm5 ft 6 inWheelbase 2,765 mmWheelbase 9 ft 1 inLength 4,648 mmLength 15 ft 3 in1,618 mm5 ft 4 in

Scale about 1:22 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles

Dimensions and difference

The Outlander GF is 7 mm0.3 in longer, 77 mm3 in narrower and 62 mm2 in taller than the Enyaq I. Its wheelbase is 95 mm4 in shorter.

DimensionOutlander GFEnyaq IDifference, car 1 vs car 2
Length4,655 mm15 ft 3 in15 ft 3 in4,655 mm4,648 mm15 ft 3 in15 ft 3 in4,648 mm +7 mm+0.3 in +0.2%
Width1,800 mm5 ft 11 in5 ft 11 in1,800 mm1,877 mm6 ft 2 in6 ft 2 in1,877 mm −77 mm−3 in −4.1%
Height1,680 mm5 ft 6 in5 ft 6 in1,680 mm1,618 mm5 ft 4 in5 ft 4 in1,618 mm +62 mm+2 in +3.8%
Wheelbase2,670 mm8 ft 9 in8 ft 9 in2,670 mm2,765 mm9 ft 1 in9 ft 1 in2,765 mm −95 mm−4 in −3.4%
Footprint8.38 m²90.2 sq ft90.2 sq ft8.38 m²8.72 m²93.9 sq ft93.9 sq ft8.72 m² −0.35 m²−3.7 sq ft −4.0%
Boot591 L20.9 cu ft20.9 cu ft591 L585 L20.7 cu ft20.7 cu ft585 L +6 L+0.2 cu ft +1.0%
Kerb weight1,495 kg3,296 lb3,296 lb1,495 kg1,941–2,265 kg4,279–4,993 lb4,279–4,993 lb1,941–2,265 kg −446 kg−983 lb −23.0%

Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not. Weight difference compares the lightest versions.

Garage and parking

A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.

Outlander GF

Single garage
Fits 845 mm2 ft 9 in to spare in length, 600 mm2 ft 0 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 345 mm1 ft 2 in to spare in length, 350 mm1 ft 2 in each side

Enyaq I

Single garage
Tight 852 mm2 ft 10 in to spare in length, 562 mm1 ft 10 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 352 mm1 ft 2 in to spare in length, 312 mm1 ft 0 in each side

Check your own garage with these cars

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, the Mitsubishi Outlander GF or the Skoda Enyaq I?

The Skoda Enyaq I is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The Outlander GF is 7 mm longer, 77 mm narrower and 62 mm taller than the Enyaq I. Its wheelbase is 95 mm shorter.

Will the Mitsubishi Outlander GF and the Skoda Enyaq I fit in a standard garage?

In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Mitsubishi Outlander GF fits with room to open the doors (845 mm to spare in length, 600 mm each side). The Skoda Enyaq I fits, but it is tight to get out (852 mm to spare in length, 562 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Mitsubishi Outlander GF: 591 L against 585 L in the Skoda Enyaq I (seats up, as quoted by the maker).

Compare other cars

Report an error