Size comparison · drawn to scale
Opel Grandland II vs Mitsubishi Outlander GF: size comparison
- Length About the same length
- Width Grandland II 105 mm4 in wider
- Height Outlander GF 13 mm0.5 in taller
- Boot Outlander GF 41 L1.4 cu ft more
Car 1 blue, solid outline

Car 2 coral, dashed outline

Change cars
Zoom in to read the measurements - or see the table below.
Scale about 1:22 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles · wheelbase estimated where unknown Front view: width without mirrors Top view: footprint on the road
Dimensions and difference
The Grandland II is 5 mm0.2 in shorter, 105 mm4 in wider and 13 mm0.5 in lower than the Outlander GF.
| Dimension | Grandland II | Outlander GF | Difference, car 1 vs car 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,650 mm15 ft 3 in15 ft 3 in4,650 mm | 4,655 mm15 ft 3 in15 ft 3 in4,655 mm | −5 mm−0.2 in −0.1% |
| Width | 1,905 mm6 ft 3 in6 ft 3 in1,905 mm | 1,800 mm5 ft 11 in5 ft 11 in1,800 mm | +105 mm+4 in +5.8% |
| Height | 1,667 mm5 ft 6 in5 ft 6 in1,667 mm | 1,680 mm5 ft 6 in5 ft 6 in1,680 mm | −13 mm−0.5 in −0.8% |
| Wheelbase | Not in our catalog yet | 2,670 mm8 ft 9 in8 ft 9 in2,670 mm | - |
| Footprint | 8.86 m²95.3 sq ft95.3 sq ft8.86 m² | 8.38 m²90.2 sq ft90.2 sq ft8.38 m² | +0.48 m²+5.2 sq ft +5.7% |
| Boot | 550 L19.4 cu ft19.4 cu ft550 L | 591 L20.9 cu ft20.9 cu ft591 L | −41 L−1.4 cu ft −6.9% |
| Kerb weight | Not in our catalog yet | 1,495 kg3,296 lb3,296 lb1,495 kg | - |
Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not.
Garage and parking
A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.
Grandland II
- Single garage
- Tight 850 mm2 ft 9 in to spare in length, 548 mm1 ft 10 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 350 mm1 ft 2 in to spare in length, 298 mm1 ft 0 in each side
Outlander GF
- Single garage
- Fits 845 mm2 ft 9 in to spare in length, 600 mm2 ft 0 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 345 mm1 ft 2 in to spare in length, 350 mm1 ft 2 in each side
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, the Opel Grandland II or the Mitsubishi Outlander GF?
The Opel Grandland II is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The Grandland II is 5 mm shorter, 105 mm wider and 13 mm lower than the Outlander GF.
Will the Opel Grandland II and the Mitsubishi Outlander GF fit in a standard garage?
In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Opel Grandland II fits, but it is tight to get out (850 mm to spare in length, 548 mm each side). The Mitsubishi Outlander GF fits with room to open the doors (845 mm to spare in length, 600 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Mitsubishi Outlander GF: 591 L against 550 L in the Opel Grandland II (seats up, as quoted by the maker).
Drawn to one scale
Both cars use the same millimetre grid, so a longer bonnet or a taller roof shows exactly as it is.
Wheels at the real wheelbase
Dashed lines mark the axles. In Overlay both cars start at the front bumper; car 2 has a dashed outline.
Will it fit my garage?
Switch to Top view, or to feet and inches if your garage plan is in feet. Allow about 600 mm (2 ft) for opening the doors.