Garage
ENES
Car finder

Size comparison · drawn to scale

Opel Grandland II vs Mitsubishi Outlander GF: size comparison

  • Length About the same length
  • Width Grandland II 105 mm4 in wider
  • Height Outlander GF 13 mm0.5 in taller
  • Boot Outlander GF 41 L1.4 cu ft more

Car 1 blue, solid outline

Grandland II Opel · 2024–present · SUV Grandland II 4,650 × 1,905 × 1,667 mm15 ft 3 in × 6 ft 3 in × 5 ft 6 in Change

Car 2 coral, dashed outline

Outlander GF Mitsubishi · 2012–2021 · SUV Outlander GF 4,655 × 1,800 × 1,680 mm15 ft 3 in × 5 ft 11 in × 5 ft 6 in Change
Change cars

Search any brand, model or year. Models we have no dimensions for yet are shown in grey.

  • Car 1, blue, solid outline: Grandland II
  • Car 2, coral, dashed outline: Outlander GF
0 m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m1 m0 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ft6 ft7 ft8 ft9 ft10 ft11 ft12 ft13 ft14 ft15 ft16 ft17 ft18 ft19 ft20 ft21 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ftLength 4,650 mmLength 15 ft 3 in1,667 mm5 ft 6 inWheelbase 2,670 mmWheelbase 8 ft 9 inLength 4,655 mmLength 15 ft 3 in1,680 mm5 ft 6 in

Scale about 1:22 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles · wheelbase estimated where unknown

Dimensions and difference

The Grandland II is 5 mm0.2 in shorter, 105 mm4 in wider and 13 mm0.5 in lower than the Outlander GF.

DimensionGrandland IIOutlander GFDifference, car 1 vs car 2
Length4,650 mm15 ft 3 in15 ft 3 in4,650 mm4,655 mm15 ft 3 in15 ft 3 in4,655 mm −5 mm−0.2 in −0.1%
Width1,905 mm6 ft 3 in6 ft 3 in1,905 mm1,800 mm5 ft 11 in5 ft 11 in1,800 mm +105 mm+4 in +5.8%
Height1,667 mm5 ft 6 in5 ft 6 in1,667 mm1,680 mm5 ft 6 in5 ft 6 in1,680 mm −13 mm−0.5 in −0.8%
WheelbaseNot in our catalog yet2,670 mm8 ft 9 in8 ft 9 in2,670 mm -
Footprint8.86 m²95.3 sq ft95.3 sq ft8.86 m²8.38 m²90.2 sq ft90.2 sq ft8.38 m² +0.48 m²+5.2 sq ft +5.7%
Boot550 L19.4 cu ft19.4 cu ft550 L591 L20.9 cu ft20.9 cu ft591 L −41 L−1.4 cu ft −6.9%
Kerb weightNot in our catalog yet1,495 kg3,296 lb3,296 lb1,495 kg -

Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not.

Garage and parking

A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.

Grandland II

Single garage
Tight 850 mm2 ft 9 in to spare in length, 548 mm1 ft 10 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 350 mm1 ft 2 in to spare in length, 298 mm1 ft 0 in each side

Outlander GF

Single garage
Fits 845 mm2 ft 9 in to spare in length, 600 mm2 ft 0 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 345 mm1 ft 2 in to spare in length, 350 mm1 ft 2 in each side

Check your own garage with these cars

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, the Opel Grandland II or the Mitsubishi Outlander GF?

The Opel Grandland II is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The Grandland II is 5 mm shorter, 105 mm wider and 13 mm lower than the Outlander GF.

Will the Opel Grandland II and the Mitsubishi Outlander GF fit in a standard garage?

In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Opel Grandland II fits, but it is tight to get out (850 mm to spare in length, 548 mm each side). The Mitsubishi Outlander GF fits with room to open the doors (845 mm to spare in length, 600 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Mitsubishi Outlander GF: 591 L against 550 L in the Opel Grandland II (seats up, as quoted by the maker).