Size comparison · drawn to scale
MG4 I EH32 vs MG4 II Urban AH4EM: size comparison
- Length MG4 II Urban AH4EM 108 mm4 in longer
- Width About the same width
- Height MG4 II Urban AH4EM 45 mm2 in taller
- Boot MG4 II Urban AH4EM 107 L3.8 cu ft more
Car 1 blue, solid outline

Car 2 coral, dashed outline

Change cars
Zoom in to read the measurements - or see the table below.
Scale about 1:20 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles Front view: width without mirrors Top view: footprint on the road
Dimensions and difference
The MG4 I EH32 is 108 mm4 in shorter, 6 mm0.2 in narrower and 45 mm2 in lower than the MG4 II Urban AH4EM. Its wheelbase is 45 mm2 in shorter.
| Dimension | MG4 I EH32 | MG4 II Urban AH4EM | Difference, car 1 vs car 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,287 mm14 ft 1 in14 ft 1 in4,287 mm | 4,395 mm14 ft 5 in14 ft 5 in4,395 mm | −108 mm−4 in −2.5% |
| Width | 1,836 mm6 ft 0 in6 ft 0 in1,836 mm | 1,842 mm6 ft 1 in6 ft 1 in1,842 mm | −6 mm−0.2 in −0.3% |
| Height | 1,504 mm4 ft 11 in4 ft 11 in1,504 mm | 1,549 mm5 ft 1 in5 ft 1 in1,549 mm | −45 mm−2 in −2.9% |
| Wheelbase | 2,705 mm8 ft 10 in8 ft 10 in2,705 mm | 2,750 mm9 ft 0 in9 ft 0 in2,750 mm | −45 mm−2 in −1.6% |
| Footprint | 7.87 m²84.7 sq ft84.7 sq ft7.87 m² | 8.10 m²87.1 sq ft87.1 sq ft8.10 m² | −0.22 m²−2.4 sq ft −2.8% |
| Boot | 363 L12.8 cu ft12.8 cu ft363 L | 470 L16.6 cu ft16.6 cu ft470 L | −107 L−3.8 cu ft −22.8% |
| Kerb weight | 1,635–1,651 kg3,605–3,640 lb3,605–3,640 lb1,635–1,651 kg | 1,520 kg3,351 lb3,351 lb1,520 kg | +115 kg+254 lb +7.6% |
Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not. Weight difference compares the lightest versions.
Garage and parking
A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.
MG4 I EH32
- Single garage
- Tight 1,213 mm4 ft 0 in to spare in length, 582 mm1 ft 11 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 713 mm2 ft 4 in to spare in length, 332 mm1 ft 1 in each side
MG4 II Urban AH4EM
- Single garage
- Tight 1,105 mm3 ft 8 in to spare in length, 579 mm1 ft 11 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 605 mm2 ft 0 in to spare in length, 329 mm1 ft 1 in each side
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, the MG4 I EH32 or the MG4 II Urban AH4EM?
The MG4 II Urban AH4EM is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The MG4 I EH32 is 108 mm shorter, 6 mm narrower and 45 mm lower than the MG4 II Urban AH4EM. Its wheelbase is 45 mm shorter.
Will the MG4 I EH32 and the MG4 II Urban AH4EM fit in a standard garage?
In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The MG4 I EH32 fits, but it is tight to get out (1,213 mm to spare in length, 582 mm each side). The MG4 II Urban AH4EM fits, but it is tight to get out (1,105 mm to spare in length, 579 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.
Which has the bigger boot?
The MG4 II Urban AH4EM: 470 L against 363 L in the MG4 I EH32 (seats up, as quoted by the maker).
Drawn to one scale
Both cars use the same millimetre grid, so a longer bonnet or a taller roof shows exactly as it is.
Wheels at the real wheelbase
Dashed lines mark the axles. In Overlay both cars start at the front bumper; car 2 has a dashed outline.
Will it fit my garage?
Switch to Top view, or to feet and inches if your garage plan is in feet. Allow about 600 mm (2 ft) for opening the doors.