Size comparison · drawn to scale
Volvo XC60 II vs Jaguar I-Pace: size comparison
- Length About the same length
- Width About the same width
- Height XC60 II 93 mm4 in taller
- Boot I-Pace 173 L6.1 cu ft more
Car 1 blue, solid outline
Car 2 coral, dashed outline
Change cars
Zoom in to read the measurements - or see the table below.
Scale about 1:22 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles Front view: width without mirrors Top view: footprint on the road
Dimensions and difference
The XC60 II is 6 mm0.2 in longer, 7 mm0.3 in wider and 93 mm4 in taller than the I-Pace. Its wheelbase is 125 mm5 in shorter.
| Dimension | XC60 II | I-Pace | Difference, car 1 vs car 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,688 mm15 ft 5 in15 ft 5 in4,688 mm | 4,682 mm15 ft 4 in15 ft 4 in4,682 mm | +6 mm+0.2 in +0.1% |
| Width | 1,902 mm6 ft 3 in6 ft 3 in1,902 mm | 1,895 mm6 ft 3 in6 ft 3 in1,895 mm | +7 mm+0.3 in +0.4% |
| Height | 1,658 mm5 ft 5 in5 ft 5 in1,658 mm | 1,565 mm5 ft 2 in5 ft 2 in1,565 mm | +93 mm+4 in +5.9% |
| Wheelbase | 2,865 mm9 ft 5 in9 ft 5 in2,865 mm | 2,990 mm9 ft 10 in9 ft 10 in2,990 mm | −125 mm−5 in −4.2% |
| Footprint | 8.92 m²96.0 sq ft96.0 sq ft8.92 m² | 8.87 m²95.5 sq ft95.5 sq ft8.87 m² | +0.04 m²+0.5 sq ft +0.5% |
| Boot | 483 L17.1 cu ft17.1 cu ft483 L | 656 L23.2 cu ft23.2 cu ft656 L | −173 L−6.1 cu ft −26.4% |
| Kerb weight | 1,764–2,162 kg3,889–4,766 lb3,889–4,766 lb1,764–2,162 kg | 2,133 kg4,702 lb4,702 lb2,133 kg | −369 kg−814 lb −17.3% |
Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not. Weight difference compares the lightest versions.
Garage and parking
A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.
XC60 II
- Single garage
- Tight 812 mm2 ft 8 in to spare in length, 549 mm1 ft 10 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 312 mm1 ft 0 in to spare in length, 299 mm1 ft 0 in each side
I-Pace
- Single garage
- Tight 818 mm2 ft 8 in to spare in length, 553 mm1 ft 10 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 318 mm1 ft 1 in to spare in length, 303 mm1 ft 0 in each side
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, the Volvo XC60 II or the Jaguar I-Pace?
They are practically the same size. The XC60 II is 6 mm longer, 7 mm wider and 93 mm taller than the I-Pace. Its wheelbase is 125 mm shorter.
Will the Volvo XC60 II and the Jaguar I-Pace fit in a standard garage?
In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Volvo XC60 II fits, but it is tight to get out (812 mm to spare in length, 549 mm each side). The Jaguar I-Pace fits, but it is tight to get out (818 mm to spare in length, 553 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Jaguar I-Pace: 656 L against 483 L in the Volvo XC60 II (seats up, as quoted by the maker).
Drawn to one scale
Both cars use the same millimetre grid, so a longer bonnet or a taller roof shows exactly as it is.
Wheels at the real wheelbase
Dashed lines mark the axles. In Overlay both cars start at the front bumper; car 2 has a dashed outline.
Will it fit my garage?
Switch to Top view, or to feet and inches if your garage plan is in feet. Allow about 600 mm (2 ft) for opening the doors.

