Garage
ENES
Car finder

Size comparison · drawn to scale

Volvo XC90 II vs Honda Pilot III: size comparison

  • Length XC90 II 10 mm0.4 in longer
  • Width Pilot III 73 mm3 in wider
  • Height About the same height
  • Boot XC90 II 160 L5.7 cu ft more

Car 1 blue, solid outline

XC90 II Volvo · 2015–present · SUV XC90 II 4,950 × 1,923 × 1,775 mm16 ft 3 in × 6 ft 4 in × 5 ft 10 in Change

Car 2 coral, dashed outline

Pilot III Honda · 2015–2022 · SUV Pilot III 4,940 × 1,996 × 1,773 mm16 ft 2 in × 6 ft 7 in × 5 ft 10 in Change
Change cars

Search any brand, model or year. Models we have no dimensions for yet are shown in grey.

  • Car 1, blue, solid outline: XC90 II
  • Car 2, coral, dashed outline: Pilot III
0 m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m1 m0 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ft6 ft7 ft8 ft9 ft10 ft11 ft12 ft13 ft14 ft15 ft16 ft17 ft18 ft19 ft20 ft21 ft22 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ftWheelbase 2,984 mmWheelbase 9 ft 9 inLength 4,950 mmLength 16 ft 3 in1,775 mm5 ft 10 inWheelbase 2,819 mmWheelbase 9 ft 3 inLength 4,940 mmLength 16 ft 2 in1,773 mm5 ft 10 in

Scale about 1:23 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles

Dimensions and difference

The XC90 II is 10 mm0.4 in longer, 73 mm3 in narrower and 2 mm0.1 in taller than the Pilot III. Its wheelbase is 165 mm6 in longer.

DimensionXC90 IIPilot IIIDifference, car 1 vs car 2
Length4,950 mm16 ft 3 in16 ft 3 in4,950 mm4,940 mm16 ft 2 in16 ft 2 in4,940 mm +10 mm+0.4 in +0.2%
Width1,923 mm6 ft 4 in6 ft 4 in1,923 mm1,996 mm6 ft 7 in6 ft 7 in1,996 mm −73 mm−3 in −3.7%
Height1,775 mm5 ft 10 in5 ft 10 in1,775 mm1,773 mm5 ft 10 in5 ft 10 in1,773 mm +2 mm+0.1 in +0.1%
Wheelbase2,984 mm9 ft 9 in9 ft 9 in2,984 mm2,819 mm9 ft 3 in9 ft 3 in2,819 mm +165 mm+6 in +5.9%
Footprint9.52 m²102.5 sq ft102.5 sq ft9.52 m²9.86 m²106.1 sq ft106.1 sq ft9.86 m² −0.34 m²−3.7 sq ft −3.5%
Boot613 L21.6 cu ft21.6 cu ft613 L453 L16.0 cu ft16.0 cu ft453 L +160 L+5.7 cu ft +35.3%
Kerb weight1,998–2,170 kg4,405–4,784 lb4,405–4,784 lb1,998–2,170 kg1,839 kg4,054 lb4,054 lb1,839 kg +159 kg+351 lb +8.6%

Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not. Weight difference compares the lightest versions.

Garage and parking

A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.

XC90 II

Single garage
Tight 550 mm1 ft 10 in to spare in length, 539 mm1 ft 9 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 50 mm2 in to spare in length, 289 mm11 in each side

Pilot III

Single garage
Tight 560 mm1 ft 10 in to spare in length, 502 mm1 ft 8 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 60 mm2 in to spare in length, 252 mm10 in each side

Check your own garage with these cars

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, the Volvo XC90 II or the Honda Pilot III?

The Honda Pilot III is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The XC90 II is 10 mm longer, 73 mm narrower and 2 mm taller than the Pilot III. Its wheelbase is 165 mm longer.

Will the Volvo XC90 II and the Honda Pilot III fit in a standard garage?

In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Volvo XC90 II fits, but it is tight to get out (550 mm to spare in length, 539 mm each side). The Honda Pilot III fits, but it is tight to get out (560 mm to spare in length, 502 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Volvo XC90 II: 613 L against 453 L in the Honda Pilot III (seats up, as quoted by the maker).

Compare other cars

Report an error