Garage
ENES
Car finder

Size comparison · drawn to scale

Ford S-Max II CD539 vs SEAT Alhambra II 7N: size comparison

  • Length Alhambra II 7N 50 mm2 in longer
  • Width S-Max II CD539 12 mm0.5 in wider
  • Height Alhambra II 7N 65 mm3 in taller
  • Boot Alhambra II 7N 624 L22.0 cu ft more

Car 1 blue, solid outline

S-Max II CD539 Ford · 2015–2023 · Van S-Max II CD539 4,804 × 1,916 × 1,655 mm15 ft 9 in × 6 ft 3 in × 5 ft 5 in Change

Car 2 coral, dashed outline

Alhambra II 7N SEAT · 2010–2020 · Van Alhambra II 7N 4,854 × 1,904 × 1,720 mm15 ft 11 in × 6 ft 3 in × 5 ft 8 in Change
Change cars

Search any brand, model or year. Models we have no dimensions for yet are shown in grey.

  • Car 1, blue, solid outline: S-Max II CD539
  • Car 2, coral, dashed outline: Alhambra II 7N
0 m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m1 m0 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ft6 ft7 ft8 ft9 ft10 ft11 ft12 ft13 ft14 ft15 ft16 ft17 ft18 ft19 ft20 ft21 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ftWheelbase 2,850 mmWheelbase 9 ft 4 inLength 4,804 mmLength 15 ft 9 in1,655 mm5 ft 5 inWheelbase 2,920 mmWheelbase 9 ft 7 inLength 4,854 mmLength 15 ft 11 in1,720 mm5 ft 8 in

Scale about 1:22 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles

Dimensions and difference

The S-Max II CD539 is 50 mm2 in shorter, 12 mm0.5 in wider and 65 mm3 in lower than the Alhambra II 7N. Its wheelbase is 70 mm3 in shorter.

DimensionS-Max II CD539Alhambra II 7NDifference, car 1 vs car 2
Length4,804 mm15 ft 9 in15 ft 9 in4,804 mm4,854 mm15 ft 11 in15 ft 11 in4,854 mm −50 mm−2 in −1.0%
Width1,916 mm6 ft 3 in6 ft 3 in1,916 mm1,904 mm6 ft 3 in6 ft 3 in1,904 mm +12 mm+0.5 in +0.6%
Height1,655 mm5 ft 5 in5 ft 5 in1,655 mm1,720 mm5 ft 8 in5 ft 8 in1,720 mm −65 mm−3 in −3.8%
Wheelbase2,850 mm9 ft 4 in9 ft 4 in2,850 mm2,920 mm9 ft 7 in9 ft 7 in2,920 mm −70 mm−3 in −2.4%
Footprint9.20 m²99.1 sq ft99.1 sq ft9.20 m²9.24 m²99.5 sq ft99.5 sq ft9.24 m² −0.04 m²−0.4 sq ft −0.4%
Boot185 L6.5 cu ft6.5 cu ft185 L809 L28.6 cu ft28.6 cu ft809 L −624 L−22.0 cu ft −77.1%
Kerb weight1,878 kg4,140 lb4,140 lb1,878 kg1,772 kg3,907 lb3,907 lb1,772 kg +106 kg+234 lb +6.0%
Price new (EUR)from about €30,800 (2015)from about €29,605 (2010) +€1,195 +4.0%

Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not. New prices are list prices in EUR entered by our editors, with the year.

Garage and parking

A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.

S-Max II CD539

Single garage
Tight 696 mm2 ft 3 in to spare in length, 542 mm1 ft 9 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 196 mm8 in to spare in length, 292 mm11 in each side

Alhambra II 7N

Single garage
Tight 646 mm2 ft 1 in to spare in length, 548 mm1 ft 10 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 146 mm6 in to spare in length, 298 mm1 ft 0 in each side

Check your own garage with these cars

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, the Ford S-Max II CD539 or the SEAT Alhambra II 7N?

The SEAT Alhambra II 7N is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The S-Max II CD539 is 50 mm shorter, 12 mm wider and 65 mm lower than the Alhambra II 7N. Its wheelbase is 70 mm shorter.

Will the Ford S-Max II CD539 and the SEAT Alhambra II 7N fit in a standard garage?

In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Ford S-Max II CD539 fits, but it is tight to get out (696 mm to spare in length, 542 mm each side). The SEAT Alhambra II 7N fits, but it is tight to get out (646 mm to spare in length, 548 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.

Which has the bigger boot?

The SEAT Alhambra II 7N: 809 L against 185 L in the Ford S-Max II CD539 (seats up, as quoted by the maker).

Compare other cars

Report an error