Size comparison · drawn to scale
Mitsubishi Outlander GF vs Acura RDX (second generation): size comparison
- Length About the same length
- Width RDX (second generation) 72 mm3 in wider
- Height About the same height
- Boot RDX (second generation) 149 L5.3 cu ft more
Car 1 blue, solid outline
Car 2 coral, dashed outline
Change cars
Zoom in to read the measurements - or see the table below.
Scale about 1:22 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles · wheelbase estimated where unknown Front view: width without mirrors Top view: footprint on the road
Dimensions and difference
The Outlander GF is 5 mm0.2 in shorter, 72 mm3 in narrower and 2 mm0.1 in taller than the RDX (second generation).
| Dimension | Outlander GF | RDX (second generation) | Difference, car 1 vs car 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,655 mm15 ft 3 in15 ft 3 in4,655 mm | 4,660 mm15 ft 3 in15 ft 3 in4,660 mm | −5 mm−0.2 in −0.1% |
| Width | 1,800 mm5 ft 11 in5 ft 11 in1,800 mm | 1,872 mm6 ft 2 in6 ft 2 in1,872 mm | −72 mm−3 in −3.8% |
| Height | 1,680 mm5 ft 6 in5 ft 6 in1,680 mm | 1,678 mm5 ft 6 in5 ft 6 in1,678 mm | +2 mm+0.1 in +0.1% |
| Wheelbase | 2,670 mm8 ft 9 in8 ft 9 in2,670 mm | Not in our catalog yet | - |
| Footprint | 8.38 m²90.2 sq ft90.2 sq ft8.38 m² | 8.72 m²93.9 sq ft93.9 sq ft8.72 m² | −0.34 m²−3.7 sq ft −3.9% |
| Boot | 591 L20.9 cu ft20.9 cu ft591 L | 740 L26.1 cu ft26.1 cu ft740 L | −149 L−5.3 cu ft −20.1% |
| Kerb weight | 1,495 kg3,296 lb3,296 lb1,495 kg | Not in our catalog yet | - |
Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not.
Garage and parking
A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.
Outlander GF
- Single garage
- Fits 845 mm2 ft 9 in to spare in length, 600 mm2 ft 0 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 345 mm1 ft 2 in to spare in length, 350 mm1 ft 2 in each side
RDX (second generation)
- Single garage
- Tight 840 mm2 ft 9 in to spare in length, 564 mm1 ft 10 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 340 mm1 ft 1 in to spare in length, 314 mm1 ft 0 in each side
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, the Mitsubishi Outlander GF or the Acura RDX (second generation)?
The Acura RDX (second generation) is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The Outlander GF is 5 mm shorter, 72 mm narrower and 2 mm taller than the RDX (second generation).
Will the Mitsubishi Outlander GF and the Acura RDX (second generation) fit in a standard garage?
In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Mitsubishi Outlander GF fits with room to open the doors (845 mm to spare in length, 600 mm each side). The Acura RDX (second generation) fits, but it is tight to get out (840 mm to spare in length, 564 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Acura RDX (second generation): 740 L against 591 L in the Mitsubishi Outlander GF (seats up, as quoted by the maker).
Drawn to one scale
Both cars use the same millimetre grid, so a longer bonnet or a taller roof shows exactly as it is.
Wheels at the real wheelbase
Dashed lines mark the axles. In Overlay both cars start at the front bumper; car 2 has a dashed outline.
Will it fit my garage?
Switch to Top view, or to feet and inches if your garage plan is in feet. Allow about 600 mm (2 ft) for opening the doors.