Renault Kaptur vs Chevrolet Tracker / Trax I: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Renault · 2016–2023
Kaptur
- Power
- 84 kW114 PS
Photo: Александр Мотин / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
Chevrolet · 2013–2022
Tracker / Trax I
No versions in our catalog yet
- Power
- 103 kW140 PS
Photo: Maxi-Napo-99 / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- Off-road Tracker / Trax I Drive and body: All-wheel drive · SUV vs Front-wheel drive · Hatchback
In plain words
Chevrolet Tracker / Trax I is the older design (from 2013); Renault Kaptur arrived in 2016. On the catalog figures, the Chevrolet Tracker / Trax I is the pick for off-road.
Full specifications
| Renault Kaptur | Chevrolet Tracker / Trax I | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.6 · petrol · 84 kW (114 PS) | No data |
| Production years | 2016–2023 | 2013–2022 |
| Body | Hatchback | SUV |
| Class | No data | SUV / crossover |
| Country | France | United States |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 84 kW (114 PS) 113 hp | 103 kW (140 PS) 138 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 84–110 kW (114–150 PS) 113–148 hp | 103 kW (140 PS) 138 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 156 Nm 115 lb-ft | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,600 cc · 4 cyl 1.6 l | No data |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | All-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 387 l 13.7 cu ft | No data |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | No data | ★★★★★ (2013) |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (1): Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).