Renault Kaptur vs Lada XRay: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Renault · 2016–2023
Kaptur
- Power
- 84 kW114 PS
Photo: Александр Мотин / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
Lada · 2015–2022
XRay
- Power
- 90 kW122 PS
Photo: Throwawayacc222 / Wikimedia Commons, CC0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: Kaptur 0 XRay 1
- Family Too close to call Boot: 387 l vs 376 l
- Off-road XRay Drive and body: Front-wheel drive · SUV vs Front-wheel drive · Hatchback
In plain words
Lada XRay has more power: 90 kW (122 PS) against 84 kW (114 PS) for Renault Kaptur. Renault Kaptur has the bigger boot: 387 l against 376 l. Lada XRay is the older design (from 2015); Renault Kaptur arrived in 2016. On the catalog figures, the Lada XRay is the pick for off-road.
Size and weight
| Kaptur | XRay | |
|---|---|---|
| Boot | 387 l13.7 cu ft | 376 l13.3 cu ft −11 l −0.4 cu ft −2.8% |
| Fits a standard garage? | No data | Yes |
Difference vs Kaptur (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Renault Kaptur | Lada XRay | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.6 · petrol · 84 kW (114 PS) | 1.8 · petrol · 90 kW (122 PS) |
| Production years | 2016–2023 | 2015–2022 |
| Body | Hatchback | SUV |
| Class | No data | SUV / crossover |
| Country | France | No data |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 84 kW (114 PS) 113 hp | 90 kW (122 PS) 121 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 84–110 kW (114–150 PS) 113–148 hp | 78–90 kW (106–122 PS) 105–121 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 156 Nm 115 lb-ft | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,600 cc · 4 cyl 1.6 l | 1,800 cc 1.8 l |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | No data | 4,165 mm 164.0 in |
| Width | No data | 1,765 mm 69.5 in |
| Height | No data | 1,572 mm 61.9 in |
| Wheelbase | No data | 2,593 mm 102.1 in |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 387 l 13.7 cu ft | 376 l 13.3 cu ft |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Fuel, Drive.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).