Volkswagen Golf Mk5 vs Kia Ceed I: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Volkswagen · 2003–2009
Golf Mk5
- Power
- 125 kW170 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 7.9 s
- Top speed
- 220 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 1,346 kg
Photo: Vauxford / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0

Kia · 2006–2012
Ceed I
- Power
- 90 kW122 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- -
- Top speed
- -
- Kerb mass
- 1,275 kg
Photo: Calreyn88 / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: Golf Mk5 2 Ceed I 0
- Family Too close to call Boot: 350 l vs 340 l
- City Golf Mk5 Width: 1,759 mm vs 1,790 mm
- Performance Golf Mk5 Power per tonne: 93 kW/t vs 71 kW/t
In plain words
Volkswagen Golf Mk5 has more power: 125 kW (170 PS) against 90 kW (122 PS) for Kia Ceed I. Kia Ceed I is 31 mm longer than Volkswagen Golf Mk5 (4,235 mm vs 4,204 mm). Kia Ceed I is lighter by 71 kg (1,275 kg vs 1,346 kg). Volkswagen Golf Mk5 has the bigger boot: 350 l against 340 l. Volkswagen Golf Mk5 is the older design (from 2003); Kia Ceed I arrived in 2006. On the catalog figures, the Volkswagen Golf Mk5 is the pick for city and performance. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Kia Ceed I yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Race Stats side by side
Each figure is a 0–100 score from the catalog numbers, the same as on the 1CARS Race cards. PI is the overall performance index (100–999) and its class D–S.
| Stat | Golf Mk5 | Ceed I |
|---|---|---|
| PI | B · 557 | C · 499 |
| Power | 48 | 39 |
| Grip | 48 | 40 |
| Handling | 70 | 71 |
| Top speed | 46 | 37 |
| Launch | 43 | 37 |
Grip and handling are estimates from drive type, weight, height and body (hover a figure to see where it comes from). 1CARS Race
Who wins a race?
Quarter-mile (402 m) drag from a standing start, dry road, no reaction time - the 1CARS Race physics on the catalog figures of these versions.
- 1 Golf Mk5petrol · 125 kW (170 PS) 15.76 sat 141 km/h
- 2 Ceed I1.6 (122 PS) · petrol · 90 kW (122 PS) 16.52 sat 133 km/h · +0.76 s
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Golf Mk5 | Ceed I | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,204 mm165.5 in † | 4,235 mm166.7 in +31 mm +1.2 in +0.7% |
| Width | 1,759 mm69.3 in † | 1,790 mm70.5 in +31 mm +1.2 in +1.8% |
| Height | 1,465 mm57.7 in † | 1,480 mm58.3 in +15 mm +0.6 in +1.0% |
| Wheelbase | 2,578 mm101.5 in † | 2,650 mm104.3 in +72 mm +2.8 in +2.8% |
| Kerb weight | 1,346 kg2,967 lb | 1,275 kg2,811 lb −71 kg −157 lb −5.3% |
| Boot | 350 l12.4 cu ft | 340 l12.0 cu ft −10 l −0.4 cu ft −2.9% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | Yes |
Difference vs Golf Mk5 (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors. † from another version of this generation.
Full specifications
| Volkswagen Golf Mk5 | Kia Ceed I | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | petrol · 125 kW (170 PS) | 1.6 (122 PS) · petrol · 90 kW (122 PS) |
| Production years | 2003–2009 | 2006–2012 |
| Body | Hatchback, Station wagon | Hatchback, Station wagon |
| Country | Germany | South Korea |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 125 kW (170 PS) 168 hp Better | 90 kW (122 PS) 121 hp |
| Power, all versions | 55–147 kW (75–200 PS) 74–197 hp | 66–105 kW (90–143 PS) 89–141 hp |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | 7.9 s | No data |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | 220 km/h 137 mph | No data |
| Power per tonne | 93 kW/t 113 hp/ton calculated Better | 71 kW/t 86 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,204 mm 165.5 in † | 4,235 mm 166.7 in |
| Width | 1,759 mm 69.3 in † | 1,790 mm 70.5 in |
| Height | 1,465 mm 57.7 in † | 1,480 mm 58.3 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578 mm 101.5 in † | 2,650 mm 104.3 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | 1,346 kg 2,967 lb | 1,275 kg 2,811 lb Better |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 350 l 12.4 cu ft | 340 l 12.0 cu ft |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | 55 l 14.5 gal US | No data |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | 7.3 l/100 km 32.2 mpg US | No data |
| CO₂ | 174 g/km | No data |
| Fuel cost per year | €1,920/year estimated | No data |
| Range on a full tank | 753 km 468 mi estimated | No data |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | ★★★★★ (2004) | ★★★★★ (2007) |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Body, Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol. † from another version of this generation.