Volkswagen Golf Mk5 vs Kia Ceed I: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Volkswagen · 2003–2009
Golf Mk5
- Power
- 103 kW140 PS
- Kerb mass
- -
Photo: Vauxford / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0

Kia · 2006–2012
Ceed I
- Power
- 90 kW122 PS
- Kerb mass
- 1,275 kg
Photo: Calreyn88 / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: Golf Mk5 1 Ceed I 0
- Family Too close to call Boot: 350 l vs 340 l
- City Golf Mk5 Width: 1,759 mm vs 1,790 mm
In plain words
Volkswagen Golf Mk5 has more power: 103 kW (140 PS) against 90 kW (122 PS) for Kia Ceed I. Kia Ceed I is 31 mm longer than Volkswagen Golf Mk5 (4,235 mm vs 4,204 mm). Volkswagen Golf Mk5 has the bigger boot: 350 l against 340 l. Volkswagen Golf Mk5 is the older design (from 2003); Kia Ceed I arrived in 2006. On the catalog figures, the Volkswagen Golf Mk5 is the pick for city. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the Volkswagen Golf Mk5 yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Golf Mk5 | Ceed I | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,204 mm165.5 in † | 4,235 mm166.7 in +31 mm +1.2 in +0.7% |
| Width | 1,759 mm69.3 in † | 1,790 mm70.5 in +31 mm +1.2 in +1.8% |
| Height | 1,465 mm57.7 in † | 1,480 mm58.3 in +15 mm +0.6 in +1.0% |
| Wheelbase | 2,578 mm101.5 in † | 2,650 mm104.3 in +72 mm +2.8 in +2.8% |
| Boot | 350 l12.4 cu ft † | 340 l12.0 cu ft −10 l −0.4 cu ft −2.9% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | Yes |
Difference vs Golf Mk5 (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors. † from another version of this generation.
Full specifications
| Volkswagen Golf Mk5 | Kia Ceed I | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 2.0 · diesel · 103 kW (140 PS) | 1.6 (122 PS) · petrol · 90 kW (122 PS) |
| Production years | 2003–2009 | 2006–2012 |
| Body | Hatchback, Station wagon | Hatchback, Station wagon |
| Country | Germany | South Korea |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 103 kW (140 PS) 138 hp Better | 90 kW (122 PS) 121 hp |
| Power, all versions | 55–147 kW (75–200 PS) 74–197 hp | 66–105 kW (90–143 PS) 89–141 hp |
| Power per tonne | No data | 71 kW/t 86 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Diesel | Petrol |
| Engine | 2,000 cc 2.0 l | No data |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,204 mm 165.5 in † | 4,235 mm 166.7 in |
| Width | 1,759 mm 69.3 in † | 1,790 mm 70.5 in |
| Height | 1,465 mm 57.7 in † | 1,480 mm 58.3 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578 mm 101.5 in † | 2,650 mm 104.3 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | No data | 1,275 kg 2,811 lb |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 350 l 12.4 cu ft † | 340 l 12.0 cu ft |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | 55 l 14.5 gal US † | No data |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | ★★★★★ (2004) | ★★★★★ (2007) |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (1): Body.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
† from another version of this generation.