Moskvich-2140 vs Audi 80 B2: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Moskvich · 1976–1988
Moskvich-2140
- Power
- 55 kW75 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 20.0 s
Photo: Timyp / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0

Audi · 1978–1986
80 B2
- Power
- 100 kW136 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- -
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- Off-road 80 B2 Drive and body: All-wheel drive · Sedan vs Rear-wheel drive · Sedan
In plain words
Audi 80 B2 has more power: 100 kW (136 PS) against 55 kW (75 PS) for Moskvich-2140. Moskvich-2140 is the older design (from 1976); Audi 80 B2 arrived in 1978. On the catalog figures, the Audi 80 B2 is the pick for off-road. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Audi 80 B2 yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Full specifications
| Moskvich-2140 | Audi 80 B2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 55 kW (75 PS) | 2.1 five-cylinder (80 quattro) · 100 kW (136 PS) |
| Production years | 1976–1988 | 1978–1986 |
| Body | Sedan | Sedan |
| Country | Soviet Union (USSR) | Germany |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 55 kW (75 PS) 74 hp | 100 kW (136 PS) 134 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 55 kW (75 PS) 74 hp | 40–100 kW (54–136 PS) 54–134 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | No data | 176 Nm 130 lb-ft |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | 20.0 s | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | No data |
| Engine | No data | 2,144 cc · 5 cyl 2.1 l |
| Gearbox | No data | 5-speed manual |
| Drive | Rear-wheel drive | All-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,250 mm 167.3 in † | No data |
| Width | 1,550 mm 61.0 in † | No data |
| Height | 1,480 mm 58.3 in † | No data |
| Wheelbase | 2,400 mm 94.5 in † | No data |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 520 l 18.4 cu ft | No data |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | 46 l 12.2 gal US † | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (1): Body.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
† from another version of this generation.