Garage
ENES
Car finder

Comparisons

Moskvich-2140 vs Audi 80 B2: specs side by side

Report an error

Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Moskvich-2140

Moskvich · 1976–1988

Moskvich-2140

D PI 358

Power
55 kW75 PS
0–100 km/h
20.0 s

Photo: Timyp / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0
Audi 80 B2

Audi · 1978–1986

80 B2

Power
100 kW136 PS
0–100 km/h
-

All generations

Photo: Rutger van der Maar / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.0
Add a third car

At a glance

Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.

  • Off-road 80 B2 Drive and body: All-wheel drive · Sedan vs Rear-wheel drive · Sedan

In plain words

Audi 80 B2 has more power: 100 kW (136 PS) against 55 kW (75 PS) for Moskvich-2140. Moskvich-2140 is the older design (from 1976); Audi 80 B2 arrived in 1978. On the catalog figures, the Audi 80 B2 is the pick for off-road. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Audi 80 B2 yet, so some checks above leave it out.

Full specifications

Moskvich-2140Audi 80 B2
General
Version 55 kW (75 PS) 2.1 five-cylinder (80 quattro) · 100 kW (136 PS)
Production years 1976–1988 1978–1986
Body Sedan Sedan
Country Soviet Union (USSR) Germany
Performance
Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. 55 kW (75 PS) 74 hp 100 kW (136 PS) 134 hp Better
Power, all versions 55 kW (75 PS) 74 hp 40–100 kW (54–136 PS) 54–134 hp
Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. No data 176 Nm 130 lb-ft
0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. 20.0 s No data
Engine and transmission
Fuel Petrol No data
Engine No data 2,144 cc · 5 cyl 2.1 l
Gearbox No data 5-speed manual
Drive Rear-wheel drive All-wheel drive
Dimensions and weight
Length 4,250 mm 167.3 in † No data
Width 1,550 mm 61.0 in † No data
Height 1,480 mm 58.3 in † No data
Wheelbase 2,400 mm 94.5 in † No data
Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. 520 l 18.4 cu ft No data
Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. 46 l 12.2 gal US † No data

Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).

† from another version of this generation.

Photo credits