Hyundai Solaris RB vs Kia Rio UB: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Hyundai · 2011–2017
Solaris RB
- Power
- 90 kW122 PS
- Kerb mass
- -
Photo: Retired electrician / Wikimedia Commons, CC0

Kia · 2011–2017
Rio UB
- Power
- 90 kW122 PS
- Kerb mass
- 1,151 kg
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- City Too close to call Length: 4,370 mm vs 4,366 mm
In plain words
Hyundai Solaris RB is 4 mm longer than Kia Rio UB (4,370 mm vs 4,366 mm). Our catalog has no kerb mass for the Hyundai Solaris RB yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Solaris RB | Rio UB | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,370 mm172.0 in | 4,366 mm171.9 in −4 mm −0.2 in −0.1% |
| Height | 1,700 mm66.9 in | 1,455 mm57.3 in −245 mm −9.6 in −14.4% |
| Wheelbase | 2,570 mm101.2 in | 2,570 mm101.2 in |
| Fits a standard garage? | No data | Yes |
Difference vs Solaris RB (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Hyundai Solaris RB | Kia Rio UB | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.6 · 90 kW (122 PS) | 1.6 · 90 kW (122 PS) |
| Production years | 2011–2017 | 2011–2017 |
| Body | Sedan, Hatchback | Sedan |
| Country | South Korea | South Korea |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 90 kW (122 PS) 121 hp | 90 kW (122 PS) 121 hp |
| Power, all versions | 79–90 kW (107–122 PS) 106–121 hp | 55–90 kW (75–122 PS) 74–121 hp |
| Power per tonne | No data | 78 kW/t 95 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,600 cc · 4 cyl 1.6 l | 1,600 cc 1.6 l |
| Gearbox | No data | 6-speed manual |
| Drive | No data | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,370 mm 172.0 in | 4,366 mm 171.9 in |
| Width | No data | 1,720 mm 67.7 in |
| Height | 1,700 mm 66.9 in | 1,455 mm 57.3 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,570 mm 101.2 in | 2,570 mm 101.2 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | No data | 1,151 kg 2,538 lb |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | No data | 500 l 17.7 cu ft |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | 5.0 l/100 km 47.0 mpg US | No data |
| Fuel cost per year | €1,310/year estimated | No data |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | No data | ★★★★★ (2011) |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (6): Version, Production years, Country, Power, Fuel, Wheelbase.
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.