Lada Granta vs ZAZ Chance: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Lada · 2011–present
Granta
- Power
- 78 kW106 PS
Photo: Vadim Chuprina / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0

ZAZ · 2009–2015
Chance
- Power
- 51 kW69 PS
Photo: Throwawayacc222 / Wikimedia Commons, CC0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- City Too close to call Length: 4,247 mm vs 4,237 mm
In plain words
Lada Granta has more power: 78 kW (106 PS) against 51 kW (69 PS) for ZAZ Chance. Lada Granta is 10 mm longer than ZAZ Chance (4,247 mm vs 4,237 mm). ZAZ Chance is the older design (from 2009); Lada Granta arrived in 2011. Lada Granta is still in production; ZAZ Chance is not.
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Granta | Chance | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,247 mm167.2 in | 4,237 mm166.8 in −10 mm −0.4 in −0.2% |
| Width | 1,700 mm66.9 in | 1,678 mm66.1 in −22 mm −0.9 in −1.3% |
| Height | 1,500 mm59.1 in | 1,432 mm56.4 in −68 mm −2.7 in −4.5% |
| Wheelbase | 2,476 mm97.5 in | 2,520 mm99.2 in +44 mm +1.7 in +1.8% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | Yes |
Difference vs Granta (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Lada Granta | ZAZ Chance | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 78 kW (106 PS) | 1.3 · petrol · 51 kW (69 PS) |
| Production years | 2011–present | 2009–2015 |
| Body | Sedan, Hatchback | Sedan |
| Country | No data | Ukraine |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 78 kW (106 PS) 105 hp Better | 51 kW (69 PS) 68 hp |
| Power, all versions | 64–87 kW (87–118 PS) 86–117 hp | 51–74 kW (69–101 PS) 68–99 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 148 Nm 109 lb-ft Better | 108 Nm 80 lb-ft |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | No data | 1,300 cc 1.3 l |
| Gearbox | No data | 5-speed manual |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,247 mm 167.2 in | 4,237 mm 166.8 in |
| Width | 1,700 mm 66.9 in | 1,678 mm 66.1 in |
| Height | 1,500 mm 59.1 in | 1,432 mm 56.4 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,476 mm 97.5 in | 2,520 mm 99.2 in |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 520 l 18.4 cu ft | No data |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | No data | 48 l 12.7 gal US |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Fuel, Drive.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).