Lada Granta vs ZAZ Chance: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Lada · 2011–present
Granta
- Power
- 72 kW98 PS
Photo: Vadim Chuprina / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0

ZAZ · 2009–2015
Chance
- Power
- 51 kW69 PS
Photo: Throwawayacc222 / Wikimedia Commons, CC0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- City Too close to call Length: 4,247 mm vs 4,237 mm
In plain words
Lada Granta has more power: 72 kW (98 PS) against 51 kW (69 PS) for ZAZ Chance. Lada Granta is 10 mm longer than ZAZ Chance (4,247 mm vs 4,237 mm). ZAZ Chance is the older design (from 2009); Lada Granta arrived in 2011. Lada Granta is still in production; ZAZ Chance is not.
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Granta | Chance | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,247 mm167.2 in | 4,237 mm166.8 in −10 mm −0.4 in −0.2% |
| Width | 1,700 mm66.9 in | 1,678 mm66.1 in −22 mm −0.9 in −1.3% |
| Height | 1,500 mm59.1 in | 1,432 mm56.4 in −68 mm −2.7 in −4.5% |
| Wheelbase | 2,476 mm97.5 in | 2,520 mm99.2 in +44 mm +1.7 in +1.8% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | Yes |
Difference vs Granta (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Lada Granta | ZAZ Chance | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 72 kW (98 PS) | 1.3 · petrol · 51 kW (69 PS) |
| Production years | 2011–present | 2009–2015 |
| Body | Sedan, Hatchback | Sedan |
| Country | No data | Ukraine |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 72 kW (98 PS) 97 hp Better | 51 kW (69 PS) 68 hp |
| Power, all versions | 64–87 kW (87–118 PS) 86–117 hp | 51–74 kW (69–101 PS) 68–99 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | No data | 108 Nm 80 lb-ft |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | No data | 1,300 cc 1.3 l |
| Gearbox | automatic | 5-speed manual |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,247 mm 167.2 in | 4,237 mm 166.8 in |
| Width | 1,700 mm 66.9 in | 1,678 mm 66.1 in |
| Height | 1,500 mm 59.1 in | 1,432 mm 56.4 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,476 mm 97.5 in | 2,520 mm 99.2 in |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 520 l 18.4 cu ft | No data |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | No data | 48 l 12.7 gal US |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Fuel, Drive.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).