Garage
ENES
Car finder

Comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq NS7 vs Mitsubishi Outlander GF: specs side by side

Report an error

Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Skoda Kodiaq NS7

Skoda · 2016–2026

Kodiaq NS7

C PI 470

Power
132 kW179 PS
0–100 km/h
8.0 s
Top speed
207 km/h
Kerb mass
1,695 kg

Version spec sheet

Photo: Mr.choppers / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0
Mitsubishi Outlander GF

Mitsubishi · 2012–2021

Outlander GF

C PI 493

Power
110 kW150 PS
0–100 km/h
-
Top speed
-
Kerb mass
1,495 kg

Version spec sheet All generations

Photo: Dinkun Chen / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
Add a third car

At a glance

Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.

Categories won: Kodiaq NS7 2 Outlander GF 1

  • Family Kodiaq NS7 Boot: 650 l vs 591 l
  • City Too close to call Length: 4,697 mm vs 4,655 mm
  • Performance Kodiaq NS7 Power per tonne: 78 kW/t vs 74 kW/t
  • Off-road Outlander GF Drive and body: Four-wheel drive (4×4) · SUV vs All-wheel drive · SUV

In plain words

Skoda Kodiaq NS7 has more power: 132 kW (179 PS) against 110 kW (150 PS) for Mitsubishi Outlander GF. Skoda Kodiaq NS7 is 42 mm longer than Mitsubishi Outlander GF (4,697 mm vs 4,655 mm). Mitsubishi Outlander GF is lighter by 200 kg (1,495 kg vs 1,695 kg). Skoda Kodiaq NS7 has the bigger boot: 650 l against 591 l. Mitsubishi Outlander GF is the older design (from 2012); Skoda Kodiaq NS7 arrived in 2016. On the catalog figures, the Skoda Kodiaq NS7 is the pick for family and performance; the Mitsubishi Outlander GF is the pick for off-road. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Mitsubishi Outlander GF yet, so some checks above leave it out.

Race Stats side by side

Each figure is a 0–100 score from the catalog numbers, the same as on the 1CARS Race cards. PI is the overall performance index (100–999) and its class D–S.

Race Stats side by side
StatKodiaq NS7Outlander GF
PIC · 470C · 493
Power 42 40
Grip 30 49
Handling 50 53
Top speed 41 35
Launch 42 42

Grip and handling are estimates from drive type, weight, height and body (hover a figure to see where it comes from). 1CARS Race

Who wins a race?

Quarter-mile (402 m) drag from a standing start, dry road, no reaction time - the 1CARS Race physics on the catalog figures of these versions.

  1. 1 Outlander GF2.2 DI-D diesel · 110 kW (150 PS) 15.82 sat 135 km/h
  2. 2 Kodiaq NS72.0 · petrol · 132 kW (179 PS) 15.88 sat 140 km/h · +0.06 s

Race them in 1CARS Race →

Size and weight

Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.

Kodiaq NS7 · Outlander GF
0 m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m1 m0 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ft6 ft7 ft8 ft9 ft10 ft11 ft12 ft13 ft14 ft15 ft16 ft17 ft18 ft19 ft20 ft21 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ftWheelbase 2,791 mmWheelbase 9 ft 2 inLength 4,697 mmLength 15 ft 5 in1,676 mm5 ft 6 inWheelbase 2,670 mmWheelbase 8 ft 9 inLength 4,655 mmLength 15 ft 3 in1,680 mm5 ft 6 in
Kodiaq NS7Outlander GF
Length 4,697 mm184.9 in 4,655 mm183.3 in −42 mm −1.7 in −0.9%
Height 1,676 mm66.0 in 1,680 mm66.1 in +4 mm +0.2 in +0.2%
Wheelbase 2,791 mm109.9 in 2,670 mm105.1 in −121 mm −4.8 in −4.3%
Kerb weight 1,695 kg3,737 lb 1,495 kg3,296 lb −200 kg −441 lb −11.8%
Boot 650 l23.0 cu ft 591 l20.9 cu ft −59 l −2.1 cu ft −9.1%
Fits a standard garage? No dataYes

Difference vs Kodiaq NS7 (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.

Size comparison to scale: Front and top views, inches →

Full specifications

Skoda Kodiaq NS7Mitsubishi Outlander GF
General
Version 2.0 · petrol · 132 kW (179 PS) 2.2 DI-D diesel · 110 kW (150 PS)
Production years 2016–2026 2012–2021
Body SUV SUV
Class SUV / crossover SUV / crossover
Country Czech Republic Japan
Performance
Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. 132 kW (179 PS) 177 hp Better 110 kW (150 PS) 148 hp
Power, all versions 92–180 kW (125–245 PS) 123–241 hp 110–165 kW (150–224 PS) 148–221 hp
Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. No data 380 Nm 280 lb-ft
0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. 8.0 s No data
Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. 207 km/h 129 mph No data
Power per tonne 78 kW/t 95 hp/ton calculated Better 74 kW/t 90 hp/ton calculated
Engine and transmission
Fuel Petrol Diesel
Engine 2,000 cc 2.0 l 2,268 cc 2.3 l
Gearbox No data 6-speed automatic
Drive All-wheel drive Four-wheel drive (4×4)
Dimensions and weight
Length 4,697 mm 184.9 in 4,655 mm 183.3 in
Width No data 1,800 mm 70.9 in
Height 1,676 mm 66.0 in 1,680 mm 66.1 in
Wheelbase 2,791 mm 109.9 in 2,670 mm 105.1 in
Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. 1,695 kg 3,737 lb 1,495 kg 3,296 lb Better
Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. 650 l 23.0 cu ft Better 591 l 20.9 cu ft
Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. 60 l 15.9 gal US No data
Economy and running costs
Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. 7.4 l/100 km 31.8 mpg US No data
CO₂ 170 g/km No data
Fuel cost per year €1,940/year estimated No data
Range on a full tank 811 km 504 mi estimated No data
Safety
Euro NCAP ★★★★★ (2017) ★★★★★ (2012)

Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).

Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.

Photo credits