Daewoo Gentra vs Chevrolet Cobalt II: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Daewoo · 2013–2015
Gentra
- Power
- 79 kW107 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 11.9 s
Photo: Throwawayacc222 / Wikimedia Commons, CC0
Chevrolet · 2011–present
Cobalt II
- Power
- 64 kW87 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- -
Photo: Dawn from Calgary, Canada / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- Family Cobalt II Boot: 545 l vs 405 l
In plain words
Daewoo Gentra has more power: 79 kW (107 PS) against 64 kW (87 PS) for Chevrolet Cobalt II. Chevrolet Cobalt II has the bigger boot: 545 l against 405 l. Chevrolet Cobalt II is the older design (from 2011); Daewoo Gentra arrived in 2013. Chevrolet Cobalt II is still in production; Daewoo Gentra is not. On the catalog figures, the Chevrolet Cobalt II is the pick for family. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Chevrolet Cobalt II yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Size and weight
| Gentra | Cobalt II | |
|---|---|---|
| Wheelbase | 2,600 mm102.4 in | 2,620 mm103.1 in +20 mm +0.8 in +0.8% |
| Boot | 405 l14.3 cu ft | 545 l19.2 cu ft +140 l +4.9 cu ft +34.6% |
| Fuel tank | 60 l15.9 gal US | 46 l12.2 gal US −14 l −3.7 gal US −23.3% |
Difference vs Gentra (±).
Full specifications
| Daewoo Gentra | Chevrolet Cobalt II | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.5 · petrol · 79 kW (107 PS) | petrol · 64 kW (87 PS) |
| Production years | 2013–2015 | 2011–present |
| Body | Sedan | Sedan |
| Country | Uzbekistan | United States |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 79 kW (107 PS) 106 hp Better | 64 kW (87 PS) 86 hp |
| Power, all versions | 79 kW (107 PS) 106 hp | 64–77 kW (87–105 PS) 86–103 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 141 Nm 104 lb-ft | No data |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | 11.9 s | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,500 cc 1.5 l | No data |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | No data |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,515 mm 177.8 in | No data |
| Width | No data | 1,514 mm 59.6 in |
| Height | No data | 1,514 mm 59.6 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,600 mm 102.4 in | 2,620 mm 103.1 in |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 405 l 14.3 cu ft | 545 l 19.2 cu ft Better |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | 60 l 15.9 gal US Better | 46 l 12.2 gal US |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Body, Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).