Honda Accord VI vs GAZ-3111: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Honda · 1998–2002
Accord VI
- Power
- 147 kW200 PS
- Kerb mass
- -
Photo: Rolander / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0
GAZ · 1998–2004
GAZ-3111
- Power
- 114 kW155 PS
- Kerb mass
- 1,560 kg
Photo: Артём_00 / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- City Accord VI Length: 4,635 mm vs 4,950 mm; Width: 1,695 mm vs 1,800 mm
In plain words
Honda Accord VI has more power: 147 kW (200 PS) against 114 kW (155 PS) for GAZ-3111. GAZ-3111 is 315 mm longer than Honda Accord VI (4,950 mm vs 4,635 mm). On the catalog figures, the Honda Accord VI is the pick for city. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the Honda Accord VI yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Size and weight
| Accord VI | GAZ-3111 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,635 mm182.5 in | 4,950 mm194.9 in +315 mm +12.4 in +6.8% |
| Width | 1,695 mm66.7 in | 1,800 mm70.9 in +105 mm +4.1 in +6.2% |
| Wheelbase | 2,665 mm104.9 in | 2,791 mm109.9 in +126 mm +5.0 in +4.7% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | Tight |
Difference vs Accord VI (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Honda Accord VI | GAZ-3111 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 3.0 · 147 kW (200 PS) | 2.5 · petrol · 114 kW (155 PS) |
| Production years | 1998–2002 | 1998–2004 |
| Body | Sedan, Coupe | Sedan |
| Country | Japan | No data |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 147 kW (200 PS) 197 hp Better | 114 kW (155 PS) 153 hp |
| Power, all versions | 85–147 kW (116–200 PS) 114–197 hp | 114 kW (155 PS) 153 hp |
| Power per tonne | No data | 73 kW/t 89 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Diesel | Petrol |
| Engine | 3,000 cc · 3 cyl 3.0 l | 2,500 cc 2.5 l |
| Drive | No data | Rear-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,635 mm 182.5 in | 4,950 mm 194.9 in |
| Width | 1,695 mm 66.7 in | 1,800 mm 70.9 in |
| Height | 1,420 mm 55.9 in | No data |
| Wheelbase | 2,665 mm 104.9 in | 2,791 mm 109.9 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | No data | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | No data | 600 l 21.2 cu ft |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).