Skoda Kodiaq II vs Mitsubishi Outlander GN: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Skoda · 2023–present
Kodiaq II
- Power
- 195 kW265 PS
- Kerb mass
- -
Photo: Alexander-93 / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
Mitsubishi · 2021–present
Outlander GN
- Power
- 188 kW256 PS
- Kerb mass
- 2,179 kg
Version spec sheet All generations
Photo: LuvsMG481 / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- City Kodiaq II Width: 1,864 mm vs 1,897 mm
In plain words
Skoda Kodiaq II has more power: 195 kW (265 PS) against 188 kW (256 PS) for Mitsubishi Outlander GN. Skoda Kodiaq II is 49 mm longer than Mitsubishi Outlander GN (4,758 mm vs 4,709 mm). Mitsubishi Outlander GN is the older design (from 2021); Skoda Kodiaq II arrived in 2023. On the catalog figures, the Skoda Kodiaq II is the pick for city. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the Skoda Kodiaq II yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Kodiaq II | Outlander GN | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,758 mm187.3 in † | 4,709 mm185.4 in † −49 mm −1.9 in −1.0% |
| Width | 1,864 mm73.4 in † | 1,897 mm74.7 in † +33 mm +1.3 in +1.8% |
| Height | 1,679 mm66.1 in † | 1,745 mm68.7 in † +66 mm +2.6 in +3.9% |
| Wheelbase | 2,789 mm109.8 in † | 2,705 mm106.5 in † −84 mm −3.3 in −3.0% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Tight | Tight |
Difference vs Kodiaq II (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors. † from another version of this generation.
Full specifications
| Skoda Kodiaq II | Mitsubishi Outlander GN | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | RS 2.0 TSI · petrol · 195 kW (265 PS) | 2.4 PHEV · plug-in hybrid · 188 kW (256 PS) |
| Production years | 2023–present | 2021–present |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | Czech Republic | Japan |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 195 kW (265 PS) 261 hp Better | 188 kW (256 PS) 252 hp |
| Power, all versions | 110–195 kW (150–265 PS) 148–261 hp | 120–225 kW (163–306 PS) 161–302 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | No data | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| Power per tonne | No data | 86 kW/t 105 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Plug-in hybrid |
| Engine | No data | 2,360 cc · 4 cyl 2.4 l |
| Engine code | No data | 4B12 |
| Drive | No data | All-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,758 mm 187.3 in † | 4,709 mm 185.4 in † |
| Width | 1,864 mm 73.4 in † | 1,897 mm 74.7 in † |
| Height | 1,679 mm 66.1 in † | 1,745 mm 68.7 in † |
| Wheelbase | 2,789 mm 109.8 in † | 2,705 mm 106.5 in † |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | No data | 2,179 kg 4,804 lb |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 910 l 32.1 cu ft † | No data |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | 55 l 14.5 gal US † | No data |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | No data | 0.8 l/100 km 294.0 mpg US |
| CO₂ | No data | 19 g/km |
| Fuel cost per year | No data | €210/year estimated |
| Electric | ||
| Battery Why it matters: A bigger battery usually gives more range, but takes longer to charge fully. | No data | 20 kWh |
| Electric range Why it matters: A longer range means fewer charging stops on long journeys. | No data | 87 km 54 mi |
| Energy use | No data | 23.4 kWh/100 km |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | ★★★★★ (2024) | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Body, Class.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol. † from another version of this generation.