Honda Accord CD vs Nissan Cefiro A32: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Honda · 1993–1998
Accord CD
- Power
- 127 kW173 PS
Photo: Rudolf Stricker / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0
Nissan · 1994–1998
Cefiro A32
- Power
- 103 kW140 PS
Photo: Calreyn88 / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- Family Cefiro A32 Boot: 440 l vs 405 l
In plain words
Honda Accord CD has more power: 127 kW (173 PS) against 103 kW (140 PS) for Nissan Cefiro A32. Nissan Cefiro A32 has the bigger boot: 440 l against 405 l. Honda Accord CD is the older design (from 1993); Nissan Cefiro A32 arrived in 1994. On the catalog figures, the Nissan Cefiro A32 is the pick for family.
Size and weight
| Accord CD | Cefiro A32 | |
|---|---|---|
| Boot | 405 l14.3 cu ft | 440 l15.5 cu ft +35 l +1.2 cu ft +8.6% |
Difference vs Accord CD (±).
Full specifications
| Honda Accord CD | Nissan Cefiro A32 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 2.7 · 127 kW (173 PS) | 2.0 · 103 kW (140 PS) |
| Production years | 1993–1998 | 1994–1998 |
| Body | Sedan, Coupe | Sedan |
| Country | Japan | Japan |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 127 kW (173 PS) 170 hp Better | 103 kW (140 PS) 138 hp |
| Power, all versions | 77–140 kW (105–190 PS) 103–188 hp | 103–141 kW (140–192 PS) 138–189 hp |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | No data | Petrol |
| Engine | 2,700 cc 2.7 l | 2,000 cc 2.0 l |
| Drive | No data | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 405 l 14.3 cu ft | 440 l 15.5 cu ft Better |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (1): Country.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).