Roewe 950 vs Geely Emgrand EC8: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Roewe · 2012–2019
950
- Power
- 137 kW186 PS
- Kerb mass
- -
Photo: Navigator84 / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0
Geely · 2010–2014
Emgrand EC8
- Power
- 100 kW136 PS
- Kerb mass
- 1,490 kg
Photo: MoonArchi / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- City Too close to call Length: 4,996 mm vs 4,905 mm
In plain words
Roewe 950 has more power: 137 kW (186 PS) against 100 kW (136 PS) for Geely Emgrand EC8. Roewe 950 is 91 mm longer than Geely Emgrand EC8 (4,996 mm vs 4,905 mm). Geely Emgrand EC8 is the older design (from 2010); Roewe 950 arrived in 2012. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the Roewe 950 yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Size and weight
| 950 | Emgrand EC8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,996 mm196.7 in | 4,905 mm193.1 in −91 mm −3.6 in −1.8% |
| Width | 1,857 mm73.1 in | 1,830 mm72.0 in −27 mm −1.1 in −1.5% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Tight | Tight |
Difference vs 950 (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Roewe 950 | Geely Emgrand EC8 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 2.4 · petrol · 137 kW (186 PS) | 2.0 · 100 kW (136 PS) |
| Production years | 2012–2019 | 2010–2014 |
| Body | Sedan | Sedan |
| Country | China | China |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 137 kW (186 PS) 184 hp Better | 100 kW (136 PS) 134 hp |
| Power, all versions | 108–190 kW (147–258 PS) 145–255 hp | 100–115 kW (136–156 PS) 134–154 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | No data |
| Power per tonne | No data | 67 kW/t 82 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 2,400 cc · 4 cyl 2.4 l | 2,000 cc 2.0 l |
| Gearbox | No data | 5-speed manual |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,996 mm 196.7 in | 4,905 mm 193.1 in |
| Width | 1,857 mm 73.1 in | 1,830 mm 72.0 in |
| Height | 1,502 mm 59.1 in | No data |
| Wheelbase | 2,837 mm 111.7 in | No data |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | No data | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | No data | 500 l 17.7 cu ft |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (3): Body, Country, Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).