JAC S5 vs Geely Emgrand X7: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
JAC · 2013–2019
S5
- Power
- 129 kW175 PS
Photo: order_242 from Chile / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 2.0
Geely · 2015
Emgrand X7
- Power
- 92 kW125 PS
Photo: Retired electrician / Wikimedia Commons, CC0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: S5 0 Emgrand X7 2
- Family Emgrand X7 Boot: 580 l vs 500 l
- Off-road Emgrand X7 Drive and body: All-wheel drive · SUV vs Front-wheel drive · SUV
In plain words
JAC S5 has more power: 129 kW (175 PS) against 92 kW (125 PS) for Geely Emgrand X7. Geely Emgrand X7 has the bigger boot: 580 l against 500 l. JAC S5 is the older design (from 2013); Geely Emgrand X7 arrived in 2015. On the catalog figures, the Geely Emgrand X7 is the pick for family and off-road.
Size and weight
| S5 | Emgrand X7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Boot | 500 l17.7 cu ft | 580 l20.5 cu ft +80 l +2.8 cu ft +16.0% |
Difference vs S5 (±).
Full specifications
| JAC S5 | Geely Emgrand X7 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 2.0 · 129 kW (175 PS) | petrol · 92 kW (125 PS) |
| Production years | 2013–2019 | 2015 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | China | China |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 129 kW (175 PS) 173 hp Better | 92 kW (125 PS) 123 hp |
| Power, all versions | 100–129 kW (136–175 PS) 134–173 hp | 92–110 kW (125–150 PS) 123–148 hp |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 2,000 cc 2.0 l | No data |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | All-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,430 mm 174.4 in | No data |
| Height | 1,660 mm 65.4 in | No data |
| Wheelbase | 2,645 mm 104.1 in | No data |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 500 l 17.7 cu ft | 580 l 20.5 cu ft Better |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | No data | 8.4 l/100 km 28.0 mpg US |
| Fuel cost per year | No data | €2,210/year estimated |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (4): Body, Class, Country, Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.