ZAZ Chance vs Lada Granta: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

ZAZ · 2009–2015
Chance
- Power
- 74 kW101 PS
Photo: Throwawayacc222 / Wikimedia Commons, CC0

Lada · 2011–present
Granta
- Power
- 72 kW98 PS
Photo: Vadim Chuprina / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- City Too close to call Length: 4,237 mm vs 4,247 mm
In plain words
ZAZ Chance has more power: 74 kW (101 PS) against 72 kW (98 PS) for Lada Granta. Lada Granta is 10 mm longer than ZAZ Chance (4,247 mm vs 4,237 mm). ZAZ Chance is the older design (from 2009); Lada Granta arrived in 2011. Lada Granta is still in production; ZAZ Chance is not.
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Chance | Granta | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,237 mm166.8 in | 4,247 mm167.2 in +10 mm +0.4 in +0.2% |
| Width | 1,678 mm66.1 in | 1,700 mm66.9 in +22 mm +0.9 in +1.3% |
| Height | 1,432 mm56.4 in | 1,500 mm59.1 in +68 mm +2.7 in +4.7% |
| Wheelbase | 2,520 mm99.2 in | 2,476 mm97.5 in −44 mm −1.7 in −1.7% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | Yes |
Difference vs Chance (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| ZAZ Chance | Lada Granta | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.4 · petrol · 74 kW (101 PS) | 72 kW (98 PS) |
| Production years | 2009–2015 | 2011–present |
| Body | Sedan | Sedan, Hatchback |
| Country | Ukraine | No data |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 74 kW (101 PS) 99 hp | 72 kW (98 PS) 97 hp |
| Power, all versions | 51–74 kW (69–101 PS) 68–99 hp | 64–87 kW (87–118 PS) 86–117 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 131 Nm 97 lb-ft | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,400 cc 1.4 l | No data |
| Gearbox | 4-speed automatic | automatic |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,237 mm 166.8 in | 4,247 mm 167.2 in |
| Width | 1,678 mm 66.1 in | 1,700 mm 66.9 in |
| Height | 1,432 mm 56.4 in | 1,500 mm 59.1 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,520 mm 99.2 in | 2,476 mm 97.5 in |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | No data | 520 l 18.4 cu ft |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | 48 l 12.7 gal US | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Fuel, Drive.