SsangYong Actyon vs Suzuki Grand Vitara II (JT): specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
SsangYong · 2006–2015
Actyon
- Power
- 110 kW150 PS
Photo: OSX / Wikimedia Commons, Public domain
Suzuki · 2005–2015
Grand Vitara II (JT)
- Power
- 124 kW169 PS
Photo: Dinkun Chen / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
In plain words
Suzuki Grand Vitara II (JT) has more power: 124 kW (169 PS) against 110 kW (150 PS) for SsangYong Actyon. Suzuki Grand Vitara II (JT) is the older design (from 2005); SsangYong Actyon arrived in 2006.
Size and weight
| Actyon | Grand Vitara II (JT) | |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 1,880 mm74.0 in † | 1,810 mm71.3 in −70 mm −2.8 in −3.7% |
| Height | 1,735 mm68.3 in † | 1,695 mm66.7 in −40 mm −1.6 in −2.3% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Tight | No data |
Difference vs Actyon (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors. † from another version of this generation.
Full specifications
| SsangYong Actyon | Suzuki Grand Vitara II (JT) | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 2.0 · diesel · 110 kW (150 PS) | 2.4 · petrol · 124 kW (169 PS) |
| Production years | 2006–2015 | 2005–2015 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | China | Japan |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 110 kW (150 PS) 148 hp | 124 kW (169 PS) 166 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 104–110 kW (141–150 PS) 139–148 hp | 78–124 kW (106–169 PS) 105–166 hp |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Diesel | Petrol |
| Engine | 2,000 cc 2.0 l | 2,400 cc 2.4 l |
| Gearbox | No data | 4-speed automatic |
| Drive | All-wheel drive | No data |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,455 mm 175.4 in † | No data |
| Width | 1,880 mm 74.0 in † | 1,810 mm 71.3 in |
| Height | 1,735 mm 68.3 in † | 1,695 mm 66.7 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,740 mm 107.9 in † | No data |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | No data | 398 l 14.1 cu ft |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Body, Class.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
† from another version of this generation.