Spyker C8 Aileron vs Marussia B2: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Spyker · 2009
C8 Aileron
- Power
- 294 kW400 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 4.0 s
- Kerb mass
- -
Photo: Clément Bucco-Lechat / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0

Marussia · 2009–2014
B2
- Power
- 309 kW420 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- -
- Kerb mass
- 850 kg
Photo: Rutger van der Maar / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.0
In plain words
Marussia B2 has more power: 309 kW (420 PS) against 294 kW (400 PS) for Spyker C8 Aileron. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Marussia B2 yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Race Stats side by side
Each figure is a 0–100 score from the catalog numbers, the same as on the 1CARS Race cards. PI is the overall performance index (100–999) and its class D–S.
| Stat | C8 Aileron | B2 |
|---|---|---|
| PI | S · 882 | S · 806 |
| Power | 100 | 90 |
| Grip | 70 | 67 |
| Handling | 83 | 83 |
| Top speed | 100 | 82 |
| Launch | 74 | 62 |
Grip and handling are estimates from drive type, weight, height and body (hover a figure to see where it comes from). 1CARS Race
Who wins a race?
Quarter-mile (402 m) drag from a standing start, dry road, no reaction time - the 1CARS Race physics on the catalog figures of these versions.
- 1 C8 Aileron4.2 · 294 kW (400 PS) 11.13 sat 247 km/h
- 2 B22.8 · 309 kW (420 PS) 12.59 sat 212 km/h · +1.46 s
Full specifications
| Spyker C8 Aileron | Marussia B2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 4.2 · 294 kW (400 PS) | 2.8 · 309 kW (420 PS) |
| Production years | 2009 | 2009–2014 |
| Body | Coupe | Coupe |
| Class | Supercar | Supercar |
| Country | Netherlands | No data |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 294 kW (400 PS) 394 hp | 309 kW (420 PS) 414 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 294 kW (400 PS) 394 hp | 221–309 kW (300–420 PS) 296–414 hp |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | 4.0 s | No data |
| Power per tonne | No data | 364 kW/t 442 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | No data | Petrol |
| Engine | 4,200 cc · 8 cyl 4.2 l | 2,800 cc 2.8 l |
| Drive | Rear-wheel drive | No data |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Width | No data | 1,400 mm 55.1 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | No data | 850 kg 1,874 lb |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Body, Class.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).