Pagani Zonda R vs Koenigsegg Agera R: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Pagani · 2009–2013
Zonda R
Price from €1,460,000 (2009)
- Power
- 588 kW799 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- -
- Top speed
- -
- Kerb mass
- 1,070 kg
Photo: Pagani Automobili. Original uploader was Damiano.46 at it.wikipedia / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0

Koenigsegg · 2011–2014
Agera R
- Power
- 706 kW960 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 2.8 s
- Top speed
- 439 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 1,435 kg
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: Zonda R 1 Agera R 1
- City Agera R Length: 4,293 mm vs 4,886 mm
- Performance Zonda R Power per tonne: 550 kW/t vs 492 kW/t
In plain words
Koenigsegg Agera R has more power: 706 kW (960 PS) against 588 kW (799 PS) for Pagani Zonda R. Pagani Zonda R is 593 mm longer than Koenigsegg Agera R (4,886 mm vs 4,293 mm). Pagani Zonda R is lighter by 365 kg (1,070 kg vs 1,435 kg). Pagani Zonda R is the older design (from 2009); Koenigsegg Agera R arrived in 2011. On the catalog figures, the Koenigsegg Agera R is the pick for city; the Pagani Zonda R is the pick for performance. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Pagani Zonda R yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Race Stats side by side
Each figure is a 0–100 score from the catalog numbers, the same as on the 1CARS Race cards. PI is the overall performance index (100–999) and its class D–S.
| Stat | Zonda R | Agera R |
|---|---|---|
| PI | S · 851 | S · 889 |
| Power | 100 | 99 |
| Grip | 67 | 68 |
| Handling | 79 | 76 |
| Top speed | 100 | 100 |
| Launch | 62 | 89 |
Grip and handling are estimates from drive type, weight, height and body (hover a figure to see where it comes from). 1CARS Race
Who wins a race?
Quarter-mile (402 m) drag from a standing start, dry road, no reaction time - the 1CARS Race physics on the catalog figures of these versions.
- 1 Agera RAgera R · petrol · 706 kW (960 PS) 9.31 sat 299 km/h
- 2 Zonda R6.0 · 588 kW (799 PS) 12.33 sat 225 km/h · +3.02 s
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Zonda R | Agera R | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,886 mm192.4 in | 4,293 mm169.0 in −593 mm −23.3 in −12.1% |
| Width | 2,014 mm79.3 in | 1,996 mm78.6 in −18 mm −0.7 in −0.9% |
| Height | 1,147 mm45.2 in | 1,120 mm44.1 in −27 mm −1.1 in −2.4% |
| Kerb weight | 1,070 kg2,359 lb | 1,435 kg3,164 lb +365 kg +805 lb +34.1% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Too wide | Too wide |
Difference vs Zonda R (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Pagani Zonda R | Koenigsegg Agera R | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 6.0 · 588 kW (799 PS) | Agera R · petrol · 706 kW (960 PS) |
| Production years | 2009–2013 | 2011–2014 |
| Body | Coupe | Coupe |
| Class | Supercar | Supercar |
| Country | Italy | Sweden |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 588 kW (799 PS) 789 hp | 706 kW (960 PS) 947 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 552–588 kW (751–799 PS) 740–789 hp | 706–838 kW (960–1,139 PS) 947–1,124 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | No data | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | No data | 2.8 s |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | No data | 439 km/h 273 mph |
| Power per tonne | 550 kW/t 668 hp/ton calculated Better | 492 kW/t 599 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 6,000 cc · 12 cyl 6.0 l | 5,000 cc · 8 cyl 5.0 l |
| Gearbox | No data | 7-speed dual-clutch |
| Drive | No data | Rear-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,886 mm 192.4 in | 4,293 mm 169.0 in |
| Width | 2,014 mm 79.3 in | 1,996 mm 78.6 in |
| Height | 1,147 mm 45.2 in | 1,120 mm 44.1 in |
| Wheelbase | No data | 2,662 mm 104.8 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | 1,070 kg 2,359 lb Better | 1,435 kg 3,164 lb |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | No data | 80 l 21.1 gal US |
| Price | ||
| Price | from €1,460,000 (2009) | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (3): Body, Class, Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).