Chevrolet Cobalt II vs Daewoo Gentra: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Chevrolet · 2011–present
Cobalt II
- Power
- 64 kW87 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- -
Photo: Dawn from Calgary, Canada / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.0
Daewoo · 2013–2015
Gentra
- Power
- 79 kW107 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 11.9 s
Photo: Throwawayacc222 / Wikimedia Commons, CC0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- Family Cobalt II Boot: 545 l vs 405 l
In plain words
Daewoo Gentra has more power: 79 kW (107 PS) against 64 kW (87 PS) for Chevrolet Cobalt II. Chevrolet Cobalt II has the bigger boot: 545 l against 405 l. Chevrolet Cobalt II is the older design (from 2011); Daewoo Gentra arrived in 2013. Chevrolet Cobalt II is still in production; Daewoo Gentra is not. On the catalog figures, the Chevrolet Cobalt II is the pick for family. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Chevrolet Cobalt II yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Size and weight
| Cobalt II | Gentra | |
|---|---|---|
| Wheelbase | 2,620 mm103.1 in | 2,600 mm102.4 in −20 mm −0.8 in −0.8% |
| Boot | 545 l19.2 cu ft | 405 l14.3 cu ft −140 l −4.9 cu ft −25.7% |
| Fuel tank | 46 l12.2 gal US | 60 l15.9 gal US +14 l +3.7 gal US +30.4% |
Difference vs Cobalt II (±).
Full specifications
| Chevrolet Cobalt II | Daewoo Gentra | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | petrol · 64 kW (87 PS) | 1.5 · petrol · 79 kW (107 PS) |
| Production years | 2011–present | 2013–2015 |
| Body | Sedan | Sedan |
| Country | United States | Uzbekistan |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 64 kW (87 PS) 86 hp | 79 kW (107 PS) 106 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 64–77 kW (87–105 PS) 86–103 hp | 79 kW (107 PS) 106 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | No data | 141 Nm 104 lb-ft |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | No data | 11.9 s |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | No data | 1,500 cc 1.5 l |
| Drive | No data | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | No data | 4,515 mm 177.8 in |
| Width | 1,514 mm 59.6 in | No data |
| Height | 1,514 mm 59.6 in | No data |
| Wheelbase | 2,620 mm 103.1 in | 2,600 mm 102.4 in |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 545 l 19.2 cu ft Better | 405 l 14.3 cu ft |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | 46 l 12.2 gal US | 60 l 15.9 gal US Better |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Body, Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).