Haima 7 vs Geely Emgrand X7: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Haima · 2010–2020
7
- Power
- 110 kW150 PS
- Kerb mass
- 1,500 kg
Photo: order_242 from Chile / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 2.0
Geely · 2015
Emgrand X7
- Power
- 92 kW125 PS
- Kerb mass
- -
Photo: Retired electrician / Wikimedia Commons, CC0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- Running costs 7 Fuel per year: €2,130 vs €2,210 (estimated)
In plain words
Haima 7 has more power: 110 kW (150 PS) against 92 kW (125 PS) for Geely Emgrand X7. At 15,000 km a year, fuel would cost about €2,130 (Haima 7), €2,210 (Geely Emgrand X7) (estimated). Haima 7 is the older design (from 2010); Geely Emgrand X7 arrived in 2015. On the catalog figures, the Haima 7 is the pick for running costs. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the Geely Emgrand X7 yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Full specifications
| Haima 7 | Geely Emgrand X7 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | petrol · 110 kW (150 PS) | petrol · 92 kW (125 PS) |
| Production years | 2010–2020 | 2015 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | China | China |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 110 kW (150 PS) 148 hp Better | 92 kW (125 PS) 123 hp |
| Power, all versions | 110 kW (150 PS) 148 hp | 92–110 kW (125–150 PS) 123–148 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 180 Nm 133 lb-ft | No data |
| Power per tonne | 73 kW/t 89 hp/ton calculated | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Drive | No data | All-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,421 mm 174.1 in | No data |
| Width | 1,830 mm 72.0 in | No data |
| Height | 1,740 mm 68.5 in | No data |
| Wheelbase | 2,619 mm 103.1 in | No data |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | No data |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | No data | 580 l 20.5 cu ft |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | 8.1 l/100 km 29.0 mpg US Better | 8.4 l/100 km 28.0 mpg US |
| Fuel cost per year | €2,130/year estimated Better | €2,210/year estimated |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (4): Body, Class, Country, Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.