Garage
ENES
Car finder

Comparisons

Mazda CX-5 KF vs Mitsubishi Outlander GF: specs side by side

Report an error

Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Mazda CX-5 KF

Mazda · 2017–2025

CX-5 KF

Power
190 kW258 PS
Kerb mass
-

Photo: Vauxford / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
Mitsubishi Outlander GF

Mitsubishi · 2012–2021

Outlander GF

C PI 493

Power
110 kW150 PS
Kerb mass
1,495 kg

Version spec sheet All generations

Photo: Dinkun Chen / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
Add a third car

At a glance

Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.

Categories won: CX-5 KF 1 Outlander GF 1

  • Family Outlander GF Boot: 591 l vs 522 l
  • City CX-5 KF Length: 4,550 mm vs 4,655 mm

In plain words

Mazda CX-5 KF has more power: 190 kW (258 PS) against 110 kW (150 PS) for Mitsubishi Outlander GF. Mitsubishi Outlander GF is 105 mm longer than Mazda CX-5 KF (4,655 mm vs 4,550 mm). Mitsubishi Outlander GF has the bigger boot: 591 l against 522 l. Mitsubishi Outlander GF is the older design (from 2012); Mazda CX-5 KF arrived in 2017. On the catalog figures, the Mitsubishi Outlander GF is the pick for family; the Mazda CX-5 KF is the pick for city. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the Mazda CX-5 KF yet, so some checks above leave it out.

Size and weight

Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.

CX-5 KF · Outlander GF
0 m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m1 m0 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ft6 ft7 ft8 ft9 ft10 ft11 ft12 ft13 ft14 ft15 ft16 ft17 ft18 ft19 ft20 ft21 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ftWheelbase 2,700 mmWheelbase 8 ft 10 inLength 4,550 mmLength 14 ft 11 in1,680 mm5 ft 6 inWheelbase 2,670 mmWheelbase 8 ft 9 inLength 4,655 mmLength 15 ft 3 in1,680 mm5 ft 6 in
CX-5 KFOutlander GF
Length 4,550 mm179.1 in † 4,655 mm183.3 in +105 mm +4.1 in +2.3%
Width 1,842 mm72.5 in † 1,800 mm70.9 in −42 mm −1.7 in −2.3%
Height 1,680 mm66.1 in † 1,680 mm66.1 in
Wheelbase 2,700 mm106.3 in † 2,670 mm105.1 in −30 mm −1.2 in −1.1%
Boot 522 l18.4 cu ft † 591 l20.9 cu ft +69 l +2.4 cu ft +13.2%
Fits a standard garage? YesYes

Difference vs CX-5 KF (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors. † from another version of this generation.

Size comparison to scale: Front and top views, inches →

Full specifications

Mazda CX-5 KFMitsubishi Outlander GF
General
Version 2.5 Skyactiv-G Turbo · petrol · 190 kW (258 PS) 2.2 DI-D diesel · 110 kW (150 PS)
Production years 2017–2025 2012–2021
Body SUV SUV
Class SUV / crossover SUV / crossover
Country Japan Japan
Performance
Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. 190 kW (258 PS) 255 hp Better 110 kW (150 PS) 148 hp
Power, all versions 110–190 kW (150–258 PS) 148–255 hp 110–165 kW (150–224 PS) 148–221 hp
Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. No data 380 Nm 280 lb-ft
Power per tonne No data 74 kW/t 90 hp/ton calculated
Engine and transmission
Fuel Petrol Diesel
Engine 4 cyl 2,268 cc 2.3 l
Gearbox 6-speed automatic 6-speed automatic
Drive No data Four-wheel drive (4×4)
Dimensions and weight
Length 4,550 mm 179.1 in † 4,655 mm 183.3 in
Width 1,842 mm 72.5 in † 1,800 mm 70.9 in
Height 1,680 mm 66.1 in † 1,680 mm 66.1 in
Wheelbase 2,700 mm 106.3 in † 2,670 mm 105.1 in
Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. No data 1,495 kg 3,296 lb
Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. 522 l 18.4 cu ft † 591 l 20.9 cu ft Better
Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. 56 l 14.8 gal US † No data
Safety
Euro NCAP ★★★★★ (2017) ★★★★★ (2012)

Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).

† from another version of this generation.

Photo credits