Mitsubishi ASX I vs Chevrolet Tracker / Trax I: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Mitsubishi · 2010–2024
ASX I
- Power
- 86 kW117 PS
Photo: Rutger van der Maar / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.0
Chevrolet · 2013–2022
Tracker / Trax I
No versions in our catalog yet
- Power
- 103 kW140 PS
Photo: Maxi-Napo-99 / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0
In plain words
Mitsubishi ASX I is the older design (from 2010); Chevrolet Tracker / Trax I arrived in 2013.
Full specifications
| Mitsubishi ASX I | Chevrolet Tracker / Trax I | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.6 · 86 kW (117 PS) | No data |
| Production years | 2010–2024 | 2013–2022 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | Japan | United States |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 86 kW (117 PS) 115 hp | 103 kW (140 PS) 138 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 86–110 kW (117–150 PS) 115–148 hp | 103 kW (140 PS) 138 hp |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,600 cc 1.6 l | No data |
| Gearbox | 5-speed | No data |
| Drive | No data | All-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,295 mm 169.1 in | No data |
| Width | 1,770 mm 69.7 in | No data |
| Height | 1,625 mm 64.0 in | No data |
| Wheelbase | 2,670 mm 105.1 in | No data |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 415 l 14.7 cu ft | No data |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | ★★★★★ (2011) | ★★★★★ (2013) |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (3): Body, Class, Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).