Volkswagen Golf Mk7 vs Kia Ceed III: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Volkswagen · 2012–2021
Golf Mk7
- Power
- 151 kW205 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 7.6 s
- Top speed
- 222 km/h
Photo: Allie_Caulfield from Germany / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.0

Kia · 2018–2025
Ceed III
No versions in our catalog yet
- Power
- 85–150 kW116–204 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- -
- Top speed
- -
Photo: Vauxford / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- Family Golf Mk7 Euro NCAP: 5★ vs 4★
In plain words
Volkswagen Golf Mk7 is the older design (from 2012); Kia Ceed III arrived in 2018. On the catalog figures, the Volkswagen Golf Mk7 is the pick for family. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Kia Ceed III yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Full specifications
| Volkswagen Golf Mk7 | Kia Ceed III | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | GTE 1.4 TSI plug-in hybrid · 151 kW (205 PS) | No data |
| Production years | 2012–2021 | 2018–2025 |
| Body | Hatchback | Hatchback, Station wagon |
| Country | Germany | South Korea |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 151 kW (205 PS) 202 hp | 85–150 kW (116–204 PS) 114–201 hp |
| Power, all versions | 63–228 kW (86–310 PS) 84–306 hp | 85–150 kW (116–204 PS) 114–201 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | No data |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | 7.6 s | No data |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | 222 km/h 138 mph | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Plug-in hybrid | No data |
| Engine | 1,395 cc 1.4 l | No data |
| Gearbox | 6-speed dual-clutch | No data |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | No data |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,255 mm 167.5 in † | No data |
| Width | 1,791 mm 70.5 in † | No data |
| Height | 1,435 mm 56.5 in † | No data |
| Wheelbase | 2,631 mm 103.6 in † | No data |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 380 l 13.4 cu ft † | No data |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | 50 l 13.2 gal US † | No data |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | ★★★★★ (2012) Better | ★★★★☆ (2019) |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
† from another version of this generation.