Volkswagen Golf Mk7 vs Kia Ceed JD: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Volkswagen · 2012–2021
Golf Mk7
- Power
- 85 kW116 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 9.7 s
- Top speed
- 204 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 1,225 kg

Kia · 2012–2018
Ceed JD
- Power
- 74 kW101 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- -
- Top speed
- -
- Kerb mass
- 1,254 kg
Photo: Throwawayacc222 / Wikimedia Commons, CC0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: Golf Mk7 1 Ceed JD 0
- City Too close to call Length: 4,255 mm vs 4,310 mm
- Performance Golf Mk7 Power per tonne: 69 kW/t vs 59 kW/t
In plain words
Volkswagen Golf Mk7 has more power: 85 kW (116 PS) against 74 kW (101 PS) for Kia Ceed JD. Kia Ceed JD is 55 mm longer than Volkswagen Golf Mk7 (4,310 mm vs 4,255 mm). Volkswagen Golf Mk7 is lighter by 29 kg (1,225 kg vs 1,254 kg). On the catalog figures, the Volkswagen Golf Mk7 is the pick for performance. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Kia Ceed JD yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Race Stats side by side
Each figure is a 0–100 score from the catalog numbers, the same as on the 1CARS Race cards. PI is the overall performance index (100–999) and its class D–S.
| Stat | Golf Mk7 | Ceed JD |
|---|---|---|
| PI | C · 498 | C · 465 |
| Power | 39 | 34 |
| Grip | 40 | 40 |
| Handling | 72 | 71 |
| Top speed | 40 | 32 |
| Launch | 33 | 29 |
Grip and handling are estimates from drive type, weight, height and body (hover a figure to see where it comes from). 1CARS Race
Who wins a race?
Quarter-mile (402 m) drag from a standing start, dry road, no reaction time - the 1CARS Race physics on the catalog figures of these versions.
- 1 Golf Mk71.0 TSI · petrol · 85 kW (116 PS) 16.93 sat 130 km/h
- 2 Ceed JD74 kW (101 PS) 17.48 sat 125 km/h · +0.55 s
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Golf Mk7 | Ceed JD | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,255 mm167.5 in † | 4,310 mm169.7 in +55 mm +2.2 in +1.3% |
| Width | 1,791 mm70.5 in † | 1,780 mm70.1 in −11 mm −0.4 in −0.6% |
| Height | 1,435 mm56.5 in † | 1,470 mm57.9 in +35 mm +1.4 in +2.4% |
| Wheelbase | 2,631 mm103.6 in † | 2,650 mm104.3 in +19 mm +0.7 in +0.7% |
| Kerb weight | 1,225 kg2,701 lb | 1,254 kg2,765 lb +29 kg +64 lb +2.4% |
| Boot | 380 l13.4 cu ft | 380 l13.4 cu ft |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | Yes |
Difference vs Golf Mk7 (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors. † from another version of this generation.
Full specifications
| Volkswagen Golf Mk7 | Kia Ceed JD | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.0 TSI · petrol · 85 kW (116 PS) | 74 kW (101 PS) |
| Production years | 2012–2021 | 2012–2018 |
| Body | Hatchback | Hatchback, Station wagon |
| Country | Germany | South Korea |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 85 kW (116 PS) 114 hp Better | 74 kW (101 PS) 99 hp |
| Power, all versions | 63–228 kW (86–310 PS) 84–306 hp | 74–99 kW (101–135 PS) 99–133 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 200 Nm 148 lb-ft Better | 134 Nm 99 lb-ft |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | 9.7 s | No data |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | 204 km/h 127 mph | No data |
| Power per tonne | 69 kW/t 84 hp/ton calculated Better | 59 kW/t 72 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 999 cc 1.0 l | No data |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,255 mm 167.5 in † | 4,310 mm 169.7 in |
| Width | 1,791 mm 70.5 in † | 1,780 mm 70.1 in |
| Height | 1,435 mm 56.5 in † | 1,470 mm 57.9 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,631 mm 103.6 in † | 2,650 mm 104.3 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | 1,225 kg 2,701 lb Better | 1,254 kg 2,765 lb |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 380 l 13.4 cu ft | 380 l 13.4 cu ft |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | 50 l 13.2 gal US | No data |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | 5.6 l/100 km 42.0 mpg US | No data |
| CO₂ | 126 g/km | No data |
| Fuel cost per year | €1,470/year estimated | No data |
| Range on a full tank | 893 km 555 mi estimated | No data |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | ★★★★★ (2012) | ★★★★★ (2012) |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (4): Fuel, Drive, Boot, Euro NCAP.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol. † from another version of this generation.