Volkswagen Golf Mk8 vs Kia Ceed III: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Volkswagen · 2019–present
Golf Mk8
- Power
- 150 kW204 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 7.4 s
- Top speed
- 220 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 1,590 kg
Kia · 2018–2025
Ceed III
No versions in our catalog yet
- Power
- 85–150 kW116–204 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- -
- Top speed
- -
- Kerb mass
- -
Photo: Vauxford / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- Family Golf Mk8 Euro NCAP: 5★ vs 4★
In plain words
Kia Ceed III is the older design (from 2018); Volkswagen Golf Mk8 arrived in 2019. Volkswagen Golf Mk8 is still in production; Kia Ceed III is not. On the catalog figures, the Volkswagen Golf Mk8 is the pick for family. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Kia Ceed III yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Full specifications
| Volkswagen Golf Mk8 | Kia Ceed III | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.4 TSI eHybrid · plug-in hybrid · 150 kW (204 PS) | No data |
| Production years | 2019–present | 2018–2025 |
| Body | Hatchback | Hatchback, Station wagon |
| Country | Germany | South Korea |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 150 kW (204 PS) 201 hp | 85–150 kW (116–204 PS) 114–201 hp |
| Power, all versions | 66–235 kW (90–320 PS) 89–315 hp | 85–150 kW (116–204 PS) 114–201 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | No data |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | 7.4 s | No data |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | 220 km/h 137 mph | No data |
| Power per tonne | 94 kW/t 115 hp/ton calculated | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Plug-in hybrid | No data |
| Engine | 1,400 cc 1.4 l | No data |
| Gearbox | 6-speed dual-clutch | No data |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | No data |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,284 mm 168.7 in | No data |
| Width | 1,789 mm 70.4 in | No data |
| Height | 1,456 mm 57.3 in | No data |
| Wheelbase | 2,636 mm 103.8 in | No data |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb | No data |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 273 l 9.6 cu ft | No data |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | 40 l 10.6 gal US | No data |
| Electric | ||
| Battery Why it matters: A bigger battery usually gives more range, but takes longer to charge fully. | 10 kWh | No data |
| Electric range Why it matters: A longer range means fewer charging stops on long journeys. | 71 km 44 mi | No data |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | ★★★★★ (2025) Better | ★★★★☆ (2019) |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).