Renault Duster vs Daihatsu Terios J200: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Renault · 2010
Duster
- Power
- 84 kW114 PS
- Kerb mass
- -
Photo: Retired electrician / Wikimedia Commons, CC0
Daihatsu · 2006–2017
Terios J200
- Power
- 68 kW92 PS
- Kerb mass
- 1,125 kg
Photo: Vauxford / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- City Terios J200 Length: 4,095 mm vs 4,315 mm; Width: 1,695 mm vs 1,822 mm
In plain words
Renault Duster has more power: 84 kW (114 PS) against 68 kW (92 PS) for Daihatsu Terios J200. Renault Duster is 220 mm longer than Daihatsu Terios J200 (4,315 mm vs 4,095 mm). Daihatsu Terios J200 is the older design (from 2006); Renault Duster arrived in 2010. On the catalog figures, the Daihatsu Terios J200 is the pick for city. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the Renault Duster yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Duster | Terios J200 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,315 mm169.9 in | 4,095 mm161.2 in −220 mm −8.7 in −5.1% |
| Width | 1,822 mm71.7 in | 1,695 mm66.7 in −127 mm −5.0 in −7.0% |
| Height | 1,625 mm64.0 in | 1,705 mm67.1 in +80 mm +3.1 in +4.9% |
| Wheelbase | 2,673 mm105.2 in | 2,580 mm101.6 in −93 mm −3.7 in −3.5% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | Yes |
Difference vs Duster (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Renault Duster | Daihatsu Terios J200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.6 16V (114 PS) · petrol · 84 kW (114 PS) | 1.3 · 68 kW (92 PS) |
| Production years | 2010 | 2006–2017 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | France | Japan |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 84 kW (114 PS) 113 hp Better | 68 kW (92 PS) 91 hp |
| Power, all versions | 66–105 kW (90–143 PS) 89–141 hp | 68–80 kW (92–109 PS) 91–107 hp |
| Power per tonne | No data | 60 kW/t 73 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,600 cc 1.6 l | 1,300 cc 1.3 l |
| Gearbox | 5-speed | No data |
| Drive | All-wheel drive | No data |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,315 mm 169.9 in | 4,095 mm 161.2 in |
| Width | 1,822 mm 71.7 in | 1,695 mm 66.7 in |
| Height | 1,625 mm 64.0 in | 1,705 mm 67.1 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,673 mm 105.2 in | 2,580 mm 101.6 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | No data | 1,125 kg 2,480 lb |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | No data | 205 l 7.2 cu ft |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (3): Body, Class, Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).