Kia Sorento Prime vs Chery Tiggo 8: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Kia · 2014–2020
Sorento Prime
- Power
- 147 kW200 PS
- Kerb mass
- 2,510 kg
Chery · 2018
Tiggo 8
- Power
- 108 kW147 PS
- Kerb mass
- -
Photo: Retired electrician / Wikimedia Commons, CC0
In plain words
Kia Sorento Prime has more power: 147 kW (200 PS) against 108 kW (147 PS) for Chery Tiggo 8. Kia Sorento Prime is the older design (from 2014); Chery Tiggo 8 arrived in 2018. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the Chery Tiggo 8 yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Full specifications
| Kia Sorento Prime | Chery Tiggo 8 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 2.2 · diesel · 147 kW (200 PS) | 108 kW (147 PS) |
| Production years | 2014–2020 | 2018 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | South Korea | China |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 147 kW (200 PS) 197 hp Better | 108 kW (147 PS) 145 hp |
| Power, all versions | 147–184 kW (200–250 PS) 197–247 hp | 90–187 kW (122–254 PS) 121–251 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | No data | 210 Nm 155 lb-ft |
| Power per tonne | 59 kW/t 71 hp/ton calculated | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Diesel | Petrol |
| Engine | 2,200 cc 2.2 l | No data |
| Gearbox | 6-speed automatic | No data |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,780 mm 188.2 in | No data |
| Width | 1,890 mm 74.4 in | No data |
| Height | 1,685 mm 66.3 in | No data |
| Wheelbase | 2,780 mm 109.4 in | No data |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | 2,510 kg 5,534 lb | No data |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 660 l 23.3 cu ft | No data |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | 6.7 l/100 km 35.1 mpg US | No data |
| CO₂ | 176 g/km | No data |
| Fuel cost per year | €1,660/year estimated | No data |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | ★★★★★ (2014) | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Body, Class.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.65/l diesel.