Audi 80 B2 vs Moskvich-2140: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Audi · 1978–1986
80 B2
- Power
- 63 kW86 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- -
- Top speed
- -
- Kerb mass
- -
Moskvich · 1976–1988
Moskvich-2140
- Power
- 55 kW75 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 19.0 s
- Top speed
- 142 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 1,080 kg
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- Off-road 80 B2 Drive and body: Front-wheel drive · Sedan vs Rear-wheel drive · Sedan
In plain words
Moskvich-2140 is the older design (from 1976); Audi 80 B2 arrived in 1978. On the catalog figures, the Audi 80 B2 is the pick for off-road. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Audi 80 B2 yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Full specifications
| Audi 80 B2 | Moskvich-2140 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | petrol · 63 kW (86 PS) | 1.5 · petrol |
| Production years | 1978–1986 | 1976–1988 |
| Body | Sedan | Sedan |
| Country | Germany | Soviet Union (USSR) |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 63 kW (86 PS) 84 hp Better | 55 kW (75 PS) 74 hp |
| Power, all versions | 40–100 kW (54–136 PS) 54–134 hp | 55 kW (75 PS) 74 hp |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | No data | 19.0 s |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | No data | 142 km/h 88 mph |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | No data | 1,478 cc · 4 cyl 1.5 l |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | Rear-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | No data | 4,250 mm 167.3 in |
| Width | No data | 1,550 mm 61.0 in |
| Height | No data | 1,480 mm 58.3 in |
| Wheelbase | No data | 2,400 mm 94.5 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | No data | 1,080 kg 2,381 lb |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | No data | 520 l 18.4 cu ft |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | No data | 46 l 12.2 gal US |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | No data | 10.2 l/100 km 23.1 mpg US |
| Fuel cost per year | No data | €2,680/year estimated |
| Range on a full tank | No data | 451 km 280 mi estimated |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Body, Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.