Renault Logan L52 vs Lada Granta: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Renault · 2012–2020
Logan L52
- Power
- 55 kW75 PS
Photo: Alex Blokha / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0

Lada · 2011–present
Granta
- Power
- 72 kW98 PS
Photo: Vadim Chuprina / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- City Granta Length: 4,247 mm vs 4,348 mm; Width: 1,700 mm vs 1,733 mm
In plain words
Lada Granta has more power: 72 kW (98 PS) against 55 kW (75 PS) for Renault Logan L52. Renault Logan L52 is 101 mm longer than Lada Granta (4,348 mm vs 4,247 mm). Lada Granta is the older design (from 2011); Renault Logan L52 arrived in 2012. Lada Granta is still in production; Renault Logan L52 is not. On the catalog figures, the Lada Granta is the pick for city.
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Logan L52 | Granta | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,348 mm171.2 in | 4,247 mm167.2 in −101 mm −4.0 in −2.3% |
| Width | 1,733 mm68.2 in | 1,700 mm66.9 in −33 mm −1.3 in −1.9% |
| Height | 1,517 mm59.7 in | 1,500 mm59.1 in −17 mm −0.7 in −1.1% |
| Wheelbase | 2,634 mm103.7 in | 2,476 mm97.5 in −158 mm −6.2 in −6.0% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | Yes |
Difference vs Logan L52 (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Renault Logan L52 | Lada Granta | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.2 · diesel · 55 kW (75 PS) | 72 kW (98 PS) |
| Production years | 2012–2020 | 2011–present |
| Body | Sedan | Sedan, Hatchback |
| Country | France | No data |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 55 kW (75 PS) 74 hp | 72 kW (98 PS) 97 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 55–75 kW (75–102 PS) 74–101 hp | 64–87 kW (87–118 PS) 86–117 hp |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Diesel | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,200 cc 1.2 l | No data |
| Gearbox | No data | automatic |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,348 mm 171.2 in | 4,247 mm 167.2 in |
| Width | 1,733 mm 68.2 in | 1,700 mm 66.9 in |
| Height | 1,517 mm 59.7 in | 1,500 mm 59.1 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,634 mm 103.7 in | 2,476 mm 97.5 in |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | No data | 520 l 18.4 cu ft |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (1): Drive.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).