Renault Logan L52 vs Chevrolet Cobalt II: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Renault · 2012–2020
Logan L52
- Power
- 55 kW75 PS
Photo: Alex Blokha / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
Chevrolet · 2011–present
Cobalt II
- Power
- 64 kW87 PS
Photo: Dawn from Calgary, Canada / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.0
In plain words
Chevrolet Cobalt II has more power: 64 kW (87 PS) against 55 kW (75 PS) for Renault Logan L52. Chevrolet Cobalt II is the older design (from 2011); Renault Logan L52 arrived in 2012. Chevrolet Cobalt II is still in production; Renault Logan L52 is not.
Size and weight
| Logan L52 | Cobalt II | |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 1,733 mm68.2 in | 1,514 mm59.6 in −219 mm −8.6 in −12.6% |
| Height | 1,517 mm59.7 in | 1,514 mm59.6 in −3 mm −0.1 in −0.2% |
| Wheelbase | 2,634 mm103.7 in | 2,620 mm103.1 in −14 mm −0.6 in −0.5% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | No data |
Difference vs Logan L52 (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Renault Logan L52 | Chevrolet Cobalt II | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.2 · diesel · 55 kW (75 PS) | petrol · 64 kW (87 PS) |
| Production years | 2012–2020 | 2011–present |
| Body | Sedan | Sedan |
| Country | France | United States |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 55 kW (75 PS) 74 hp | 64 kW (87 PS) 86 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 55–75 kW (75–102 PS) 74–101 hp | 64–77 kW (87–105 PS) 86–103 hp |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Diesel | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,200 cc 1.2 l | No data |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | No data |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,348 mm 171.2 in | No data |
| Width | 1,733 mm 68.2 in | 1,514 mm 59.6 in |
| Height | 1,517 mm 59.7 in | 1,514 mm 59.6 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,634 mm 103.7 in | 2,620 mm 103.1 in |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | No data | 545 l 19.2 cu ft |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | No data | 46 l 12.2 gal US |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (1): Body.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).