Skoda Rapid NH vs Hyundai Solaris RB: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Skoda · 2012–2019
Rapid NH
- Power
- 85 kW116 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 10.0 s

Hyundai · 2011–2017
Solaris RB
- Power
- 90 kW122 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- -
Photo: Retired electrician / Wikimedia Commons, CC0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: Rapid NH 1 Solaris RB 1
- City Solaris RB Length: 4,370 mm vs 4,483 mm
- Running costs Rapid NH Fuel per year: €1,040 vs €1,310 (estimated)
In plain words
Hyundai Solaris RB has more power: 90 kW (122 PS) against 85 kW (116 PS) for Skoda Rapid NH. Skoda Rapid NH is 113 mm longer than Hyundai Solaris RB (4,483 mm vs 4,370 mm). At 15,000 km a year, fuel would cost about €1,040 (Skoda Rapid NH), €1,310 (Hyundai Solaris RB) (estimated). Hyundai Solaris RB is the older design (from 2011); Skoda Rapid NH arrived in 2012. On the catalog figures, the Hyundai Solaris RB is the pick for city; the Skoda Rapid NH is the pick for running costs. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Hyundai Solaris RB yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Rapid NH | Solaris RB | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,483 mm176.5 in † | 4,370 mm172.0 in −113 mm −4.4 in −2.5% |
| Height | 1,461 mm57.5 in † | 1,700 mm66.9 in +239 mm +9.4 in +16.4% |
| Wheelbase | 2,602 mm102.4 in | 2,570 mm101.2 in −32 mm −1.3 in −1.2% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | No data |
Difference vs Rapid NH (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors. † from another version of this generation.
Full specifications
| Skoda Rapid NH | Hyundai Solaris RB | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.6 TDI · diesel · 85 kW (116 PS) | 1.6 · 90 kW (122 PS) |
| Production years | 2012–2019 | 2011–2017 |
| Body | Hatchback, Liftback | Sedan, Hatchback |
| Country | Czech Republic | South Korea |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 85 kW (116 PS) 114 hp | 90 kW (122 PS) 121 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 55–92 kW (75–125 PS) 74–123 hp | 79–90 kW (107–122 PS) 106–121 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | No data |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | 10.0 s | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Diesel | Petrol |
| Engine | No data | 1,600 cc · 4 cyl 1.6 l |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | No data |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,483 mm 176.5 in † | 4,370 mm 172.0 in |
| Width | 1,706 mm 67.2 in † | No data |
| Height | 1,461 mm 57.5 in † | 1,700 mm 66.9 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,602 mm 102.4 in | 2,570 mm 101.2 in |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | 4.2 l/100 km 56.0 mpg US Better | 5.0 l/100 km 47.0 mpg US |
| Fuel cost per year | €1,040/year estimated Better | €1,310/year estimated |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | ★★★★★ (2012) | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.65/l diesel, €1.75/l petrol. † from another version of this generation.