Peugeot 308 II vs Kia Ceed JD: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Peugeot · 2013–2021
308 II
- Power
- 110 kW150 PS
- Kerb mass
- -
Photo: A.BourgeoisP / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
Kia · 2012–2018
Ceed JD
- Power
- 74 kW101 PS
- Kerb mass
- 1,254 kg
Photo: Throwawayacc222 / Wikimedia Commons, CC0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: 308 II 1 Ceed JD 0
- Family 308 II Boot: 470 l vs 380 l
- City Too close to call Length: 4,253 mm vs 4,310 mm
In plain words
Peugeot 308 II has more power: 110 kW (150 PS) against 74 kW (101 PS) for Kia Ceed JD. Kia Ceed JD is 57 mm longer than Peugeot 308 II (4,310 mm vs 4,253 mm). Peugeot 308 II has the bigger boot: 470 l against 380 l. Kia Ceed JD is the older design (from 2012); Peugeot 308 II arrived in 2013. On the catalog figures, the Peugeot 308 II is the pick for family. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the Peugeot 308 II yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| 308 II | Ceed JD | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,253 mm167.4 in | 4,310 mm169.7 in +57 mm +2.2 in +1.3% |
| Width | 1,804 mm71.0 in | 1,780 mm70.1 in −24 mm −0.9 in −1.3% |
| Height | 1,457 mm57.4 in | 1,470 mm57.9 in +13 mm +0.5 in +0.9% |
| Wheelbase | 2,620 mm103.1 in | 2,650 mm104.3 in +30 mm +1.2 in +1.1% |
| Boot | 470 l16.6 cu ft | 380 l13.4 cu ft −90 l −3.2 cu ft −19.1% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | Yes |
Difference vs 308 II (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Peugeot 308 II | Kia Ceed JD | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.6 · diesel · 110 kW (150 PS) | 74 kW (101 PS) |
| Production years | 2013–2021 | 2012–2018 |
| Body | Hatchback | Hatchback, Station wagon |
| Country | France | South Korea |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 110 kW (150 PS) 148 hp Better | 74 kW (101 PS) 99 hp |
| Power, all versions | 60–199 kW (82–271 PS) 80–267 hp | 74–99 kW (101–135 PS) 99–133 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | No data | 134 Nm 99 lb-ft |
| Power per tonne | No data | 59 kW/t 72 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Diesel | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,600 cc 1.6 l | No data |
| Gearbox | automatic | No data |
| Drive | No data | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,253 mm 167.4 in | 4,310 mm 169.7 in |
| Width | 1,804 mm 71.0 in | 1,780 mm 70.1 in |
| Height | 1,457 mm 57.4 in | 1,470 mm 57.9 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,620 mm 103.1 in | 2,650 mm 104.3 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | No data | 1,254 kg 2,765 lb |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 470 l 16.6 cu ft Better | 380 l 13.4 cu ft |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | ★★★★★ (2013) | ★★★★★ (2012) |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).