Opel Mokka vs Citroen C4 Aircross: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Opel · 2012–2019
Mokka
- Power
- 100 kW136 PS
- Kerb mass
- -
Photo: Jhonny89 / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
Citroen · 2012–2017
C4 Aircross
- Power
- 110 kW150 PS
- Kerb mass
- 1,146 kg
Photo: Clément Bucco-Lechat / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: Mokka 1 C4 Aircross 1
- Family C4 Aircross Boot: 384 l vs 356 l
- City Too close to call Length: 4,278 mm vs 4,341 mm
- Off-road Mokka Drive and body: All-wheel drive · SUV vs Front-wheel drive · SUV
In plain words
Citroen C4 Aircross has more power: 110 kW (150 PS) against 100 kW (136 PS) for Opel Mokka. Citroen C4 Aircross is 63 mm longer than Opel Mokka (4,341 mm vs 4,278 mm). Citroen C4 Aircross has the bigger boot: 384 l against 356 l. On the catalog figures, the Citroen C4 Aircross is the pick for family; the Opel Mokka is the pick for off-road. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the Opel Mokka yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Mokka | C4 Aircross | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,278 mm168.4 in | 4,341 mm170.9 in +63 mm +2.5 in +1.5% |
| Width | 1,777 mm70.0 in | 1,799 mm70.8 in +22 mm +0.9 in +1.2% |
| Height | 1,646 mm64.8 in | 1,625 mm64.0 in −21 mm −0.8 in −1.3% |
| Boot | 356 l12.6 cu ft | 384 l13.6 cu ft +28 l +1.0 cu ft +7.9% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | Yes |
Difference vs Mokka (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Opel Mokka | Citroen C4 Aircross | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 100 kW (136 PS) | e-HDi 150 · diesel · 110 kW (150 PS) |
| Production years | 2012–2019 | 2012–2017 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | Germany | France |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 100 kW (136 PS) 134 hp | 110 kW (150 PS) 148 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 81–112 kW (110–152 PS) 109–150 hp | 81–113 kW (110–154 PS) 109–152 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | No data |
| Power per tonne | No data | 96 kW/t 117 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | No data | Diesel |
| Engine | No data | 1,798 cc 1.8 l |
| Drive | All-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,278 mm 168.4 in | 4,341 mm 170.9 in |
| Width | 1,777 mm 70.0 in | 1,799 mm 70.8 in |
| Height | 1,646 mm 64.8 in | 1,625 mm 64.0 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,555 mm 100.6 in | No data |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | No data | 1,146 kg 2,526 lb |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 356 l 12.6 cu ft | 384 l 13.6 cu ft Better |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | ★★★★★ (2012) | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Body, Class.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).