Renault Sandero Stepway I vs Dongfeng H30 Cross: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Renault · 2008–2012
Sandero Stepway I
- Power
- 82 kW111 PS
- Top speed
- -
- Kerb mass
- -
Photo: Parzeus / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
Dongfeng · 2010
H30 Cross
- Power
- 86 kW117 PS
- Top speed
- 183 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 1,230 kg
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- Off-road Too close to call Drive and body: Front-wheel drive · Hatchback vs Front-wheel drive · Hatchback
In plain words
Dongfeng H30 Cross has more power: 86 kW (117 PS) against 82 kW (111 PS) for Renault Sandero Stepway I. Renault Sandero Stepway I is the older design (from 2008); Dongfeng H30 Cross arrived in 2010. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the Renault Sandero Stepway I yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Full specifications
| Renault Sandero Stepway I | Dongfeng H30 Cross | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.6 · 82 kW (111 PS) | petrol · 86 kW (117 PS) |
| Production years | 2008–2012 | 2010 |
| Body | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Country | France | China |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 82 kW (111 PS) 110 hp | 86 kW (117 PS) 115 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 51–82 kW (69–111 PS) 68–110 hp | 86 kW (117 PS) 115 hp |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | No data | 183 km/h 114 mph |
| Power per tonne | No data | 70 kW/t 85 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | No data | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,600 cc 1.6 l | 4 cyl |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | No data | 4,336 mm 170.7 in |
| Width | No data | 1,760 mm 69.3 in |
| Height | No data | 1,528 mm 60.2 in |
| Wheelbase | No data | 2,610 mm 102.8 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | No data | 1,230 kg 2,712 lb |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | No data | 51 l 13.5 gal US |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | No data | 7.0 l/100 km 33.6 mpg US |
| Fuel cost per year | No data | €1,840/year estimated |
| Range on a full tank | No data | 729 km 453 mi estimated |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Body, Drive.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.