Chery Tiggo 8 vs Skoda Kodiaq NS7: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Chery · 2018
Tiggo 8
- Power
- 108 kW147 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- -
- Top speed
- -
- Kerb mass
- -
Photo: Retired electrician / Wikimedia Commons, CC0
Skoda · 2016–2026
Kodiaq NS7
- Power
- 132 kW179 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 8.0 s
- Top speed
- 207 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 1,695 kg
In plain words
Skoda Kodiaq NS7 has more power: 132 kW (179 PS) against 108 kW (147 PS) for Chery Tiggo 8. Skoda Kodiaq NS7 is the older design (from 2016); Chery Tiggo 8 arrived in 2018. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Chery Tiggo 8 yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Full specifications
| Chery Tiggo 8 | Skoda Kodiaq NS7 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 108 kW (147 PS) | 2.0 · petrol · 132 kW (179 PS) |
| Production years | 2018 | 2016–2026 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | China | Czech Republic |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 108 kW (147 PS) 145 hp | 132 kW (179 PS) 177 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 90–187 kW (122–254 PS) 121–251 hp | 92–180 kW (125–245 PS) 123–241 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 210 Nm 155 lb-ft | No data |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | No data | 8.0 s |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | No data | 207 km/h 129 mph |
| Power per tonne | No data | 78 kW/t 95 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | No data | 2,000 cc 2.0 l |
| Drive | No data | All-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | No data | 4,697 mm 184.9 in |
| Height | No data | 1,676 mm 66.0 in |
| Wheelbase | No data | 2,791 mm 109.9 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | No data | 1,695 kg 3,737 lb |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | No data | 650 l 23.0 cu ft |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | No data | 60 l 15.9 gal US |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | No data | 7.4 l/100 km 31.8 mpg US |
| CO₂ | No data | 170 g/km |
| Fuel cost per year | No data | €1,940/year estimated |
| Range on a full tank | No data | 811 km 504 mi estimated |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | No data | ★★★★★ (2017) |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (3): Body, Class, Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.