Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II vs SsangYong Rexton W: specs side by side

Report an error

Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Mitsubishi · 2008–2015

Pajero Sport II

Version (4 versions)

Power: 147 kW200 PS
0–100 km/h: -

SsangYong · 2012–2017

Rexton W

C PI 403

Version

Power: 137 kW186 PS
0–100 km/h: 11.3 s

Photo: M 93 / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0 de

Add a third car

In plain words

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II has more power: 147 kW (200 PS) against 137 kW (186 PS) for SsangYong Rexton W. Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II is the older design (from 2008); SsangYong Rexton W arrived in 2012. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II yet, so some checks above leave it out.

Full specifications

General
	Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II	SsangYong Rexton W
Version	3.2 · diesel · 147 kW (200 PS)	137 kW (186 PS)
Production years	2008–2015	2012–2017
Body	SUV	SUV
Class	SUV / crossover	SUV / crossover
Country	Japan	South Korea
Performance
Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load.	147 kW (200 PS) 197 hp Better	137 kW (186 PS) 184 hp
Power, all versions	118–163 kW (160–222 PS) 158–219 hp	137 kW (186 PS) 184 hp
0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads.	No data	11.3 s
Engine and transmission
Fuel	Diesel	Diesel
Engine	3,200 cc 3.2 l	No data
Drive	All-wheel drive	No data
Dimensions and weight
Length	No data	4,755 mm 187.2 in
Width	No data	1,900 mm 74.8 in
Height	No data	1,840 mm 72.4 in
Wheelbase	No data	2,835 mm 111.6 in
Economy and running costs
Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip.	No data	7.6 l/100 km 30.9 mpg US
Fuel cost per year	No data	€1,880/year estimated

Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).

Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.65/l diesel.